Analiza i Egzystencja
Czym są tak zwane tezy Traktatu? Drabina Wittgensteina
DOI: 10.18276/aie.2017.38-02
Cytuj
Pełny tekst jest dostępny
| ISSN: | 1734-9923 |
| eISSN: | 2300-7621 |
| Autorzy: |
Jan
Wawrzyniak
Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie |
| Słowa kluczowe: | nonsense resolute reading rules of translation Wittgenstein |
| Data wydania numeru / monografii: | 2017 |
| Liczba stron: | 18 (21-38) |
| OAI-PMH: | Metadane |
 
 
 
| |
Abstrakt
The main objective of my article is the presentation and critical analysis of two possible
interpretations of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. I juxtapose the so-called
resolute reading with the metaphysical reading. The crucial dissimilarity between
these interpretations is that they ascribe different roles to the sentences contained
in the Tractatus. According to the metaphysical reading, these sentences – although
they are nonsensical from the point of view of the Tractatus – attempt to express
a certain view of reality and language, whereas according to the resolute reading,
these sentences are mere nonsense and only seem to make sense; they exemplify
nonsense and therefore show the nonsensicality of philosophical theories. I consider
the objections against both interpretations and point out that although the resolute
reading adequately presents and explains many questions concerning Wittgenstein’s
Tractatus, it requires essential modifications. In the last part of my article, I suggest
that the sentences of the Tractatus do not function as propositions but as rules of
translation.
Podgląd PDF
Bibliografia (86)
- Anscombe, G.E.M. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London:
- Hutchinson.
- Brandom, R. (2012). Między mówieniem a działaniem. Tłum. M. Gokieli. Warszawa:
- Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
- Conant, J. (1993). Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and Nonsense. W: T. Cohen, P. Guyer,
- H. Putnam (red.), Pursuits of Reason – Essays in Honour of Stanley Cavell
- (s. 195–224). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
- Conant, J. (1989). Must We Show What We Cannot Say. W: R. Fleming, M. Payne
- (red.), The Senses of Stanley Cavell (s. 242–283). Lewisburg: Bucknell University
- Press.
- Conant, J. (2002). The Method of the Tractatus. W: E.H. Reck (red.), From Frege
- to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (s. 374–462).
- Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Conant, J., Diamond, C. (2004). On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely. Reply to
- Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan. W: M. Kölbel, B. Weiss (red.), Wittgenstein’s
- Lasting Significance (s. 46–99), London: Routledge.
- Crary, A., Read, R. (red.) (2000). The New Wittgenstein. London–New York:
- Routledge.
- Crary, A., Read, R. (red.) (2009). Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo
- Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
- Dehnel, P. (2014). Ludwig Wittgenstein: teoria a terapia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo
- Naukowe PWN.
- Diamond, C. (2009). Etyka, wyobraźnia i metoda Traktatu Wittgensteina. W: A. Crary,
- R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie (s. 181–209). Wrocław:
- Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
- Diamond, C. (2005). Logical Syntax in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. The Philosophical
- Quarterly, 55 (218), 78–89.
- Diamond, C. (2004). Saying and Showing: An Example from Anscombe,
- W: B. Stocker (red.), Post-Analytic Tractatus (s. 151–166). Hants: Ashgate.
- 36 Jan Wawrzyniak
- Diamond, C. (1991). The Realistic Spirit. Wittgenstein Philosophy, and the Mind.
- Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Diamond, C. (2011). The Tractatus and The Limits of Sense. W: O. Kuusela, M. Mc-
- Ginn (red), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein (s. 240–275). Oxford–New
- York: Oxford University Press.
- Fodor, J. (2001). Language, Thought and Compositionality. Mind & Language, 16
- (1), 1–15.
- Frege, G. (1977). Fragmenty z „Grundlagen der Arithmetik”. W: G. Frege, Pisma
- semantyczne (s. 10–17). Warszawa: PWN.
- Geach, P.T. (1976). Saying and Showing in Frege and Wittgenstein. W: J. Hintikka
- (red.), Essays on Wittgenstein in Honour of G. H von Wright (s. 54–70).
- Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- Goldfarb, W. (2011). Das Überwinden: Anti-Metaphysical Readings of the Tractatus.
- W: R. Read, M.A. Lavery (red.), Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New
- Wittgenstein Debate (s. 6–21). New York: Routledge.
- Goldfarb, W. (1997). Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic
- Spirit. Journal of Philosophical Research, XXII, 57–73.
- Gomułka, J. (2016). Matematyka w Traktacie logiczno-filozoficznym. Szeregi form,
- status równań i podmiot metafizyczny. Filozofia Nauki, 2 (94), 77–93.
- Goodman, N. (1997). Jak tworzymy świat. Warszawa: Aletheia.
- Hacker, P.M.S. (2009). Czy próbował to zagwizdać? W: A. Crary, R. Read (red.),
- Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie (s. 409–447). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe
- Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
- Hacker, P.M.S. (1986). Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein.
- Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Hacker, P.M.S. (2003). Wittgenstein, Carnap and the New American Wittgensteinians.
- The Philosophical Quarterly, 51 (210), 1–23.
- Hutto, D. (2003). Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave
- Macmillan.
- Kuusela, O. (2011). The Dialectic of Interpretations: Reading Wittgenstein’s
- Tractaus. W: R. Read, M. A. Lavery (red.), Beyond the Tractatus Wars:
- The New Wittgenstein Debate (s. 121–148). New York: Routledge.
- McGinn, M. (1999). Between Metaphysics and Nonsense: Elucidation in
- Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. The Philosophical Quarterly, 49 (197), 491–513.
- Czym są tak zwane tezy Traktatu? Drabina Wittgensteina 37
- McGinn, M. (2006). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy
- of Logic and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Pears, D. (1988). The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s
- Philosophy. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Proops, I. (2001). The New Wittgenstein: A Critique. European Journal of Philosophy,
- 9 (3), 375–404.
- Soin, M. (2001). Gramatyka i metafizyka. Problem Wittgensteina. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo
- Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
- Sullivan, P. (2002). On Trying to be Resolute: A Response to Kremer on the Tractatus.
- European Journal of Philosophy, 10 (1), 43–78.
- Williams, M. (2004). Nonsense and Cosmic Exile: The Austere Reading of the
- Tractatus. W: M. Kölbel, B. Weiss (red.), Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance
- (s. 1–27), London: Routledge.
- Witherspoon, E. (2009). Koncepcje nonsensu u Carnapa i Wittgensteina. W: A. Crary,
- R. Read (red.), Wittgenstein – nowe spojrzenie (s. 369–407). Wrocław:
- Wittgenstein, L. (2000). Dociekania filozoficzne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe
- PWN.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Kartki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Niebieski Zeszyt. W: L. Wittgenstein, Niebieski i brązowy
- zeszyt. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Spacja.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo