Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

1/2020 (29)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
280
Publications
752
H-index
5
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.05
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 27 2022: 28 2023: 38 2024: 24 2025: 60 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203713
20217627
20228728
20236738
20248524
20255860
20264537

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

The influence of the Act of 22 March 2018 on bailiffs on amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure regarding execution from remuneration for work

DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.29-06
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the general issue of execution from remuneration for work and, in particular, the impact that the Act of 22 March 2018 on bailiffs had on changes in the Code of Civil Procedure. The paper uses the methods of critical analysis of sources and systematic review. So far, there has been no doubt that individuals employed under civil-law contracts are in a much worse situation than those employed under employment contracts. For this reason, the legislature wanted to protect them from execution, hence the introduc- tion of a means to make their situation equal in Article 833 § 21 of the Code of Civil Proce¬dure. Despite the good intentions of the legislature, this provision still raises doubts over the wording: ‘ensuring livelihood’. For this reason, the application of new provisions that limit the execution of recurring benefits aimed at ensuring subsistence - other than remuneration for work - requires appropriate action.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Marciniak, A., Komentarz do art. 881, in: Marciniak, A. et al. (eds.), Kodeks postępowa¬nia cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz. Art. 730-1088, Warszawa 2015.
  2. Marciniak, A., Wprowadzenie do działu II, in: Marciniak, A. et al. (eds.), Kodeks postępo¬wania cywilnego. Tom III. Komentarz. Art. 730-1088, Warszawa 2015.
  3. Pigulski, M., Zarobki zleceniobiorców silniej chronione od 2019 r., “Rzeczpospolita” 3.01.2019, https://www.rp.pl/Kadry/301039989-Zarobki-zleceniobiorcow-silniej-chro- nione-od-2019-r.html.
  4. Reiwer, R., O potrzebie uchwalenia nowej ustawy o komornikach sądowych, in: Marci¬niak, A. (ed.), Założenia projektu nowej ustawy o komornikach sądowych, Sopot 2014.
  5. Reiwer, R., Ustawa o komornikach sądowych. Komentarz, in: Reiwer, R. (ed.), Ustawa o komornikach sądowych. Ustawa o kosztach komorniczych. Komentarz, Warszawa 2019.
  6. Seweryński, M., Wynagrodzenie za pracę. Pojęcie, regulacja i ustalanie, Warszawa 1981.
  7. Szubert, W., Zarys prawa pracy, Warszawa 1976.
  8. Wiśniewski, A., Komentarz do art. 833 k.p.c., in: Jankowski, J. (ed.), Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Tom II. Komentarz. Art. 730-1217, Warszawa 2019.