Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

3/2020 (31)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1
References
9
Citations by year
YearCitations
20221

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
284
Publications
752
H-index
5
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.05
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 15 2021: 27 2022: 28 2023: 38 2024: 25 2025: 61 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203715
20217627
20228728
20236738
20248525
20255861
20264537

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)
DOAJ

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Arbitration in employment disputes - de lege ferenda comments 15 years after arbitration clauses in employment relations were introduced in the civil procedure

DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.31-06
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the existing model of employment arbitration in Poland in force since 2005. According to Article 1164 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arbitra¬tion clauses in employment disputes can only be established once a dispute has already arisen. In reality, this post-dispute voluntary regulation has no practical value and employment ar- bitration is an instrument used extremely rarely in Poland. On the basis of examination of applicable laws, the author shows that in given factual and legal circumstances a reasonable employee and a reasonable employer shall seldom have a cause to simultaneously agree to arbitrate an already existing dispute. By applying the com- parative method at the same time, the paper examines possible criteria of distinguishing categories of disputes, agreements, persons and other conditions that would permit a valid arbitration clause in employment agreements. In conclusion, the author demonstrates that, firstly, the existing voluntary post-dispute employment arbitration model in Poland is a fictitious one and requires reform and, sec- ondly, that both a full elimination of arbitration clauses in employment agreements and a full arbitration clause for all future disputes are too blunt a tool not taking into account the real needs and requirements of today’s employees and employers. The author calls for a more nu- anced regulation of employment arbitration in Poland.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Baran, K.W. (ed.), System prawa pracy. Tom I. Część ogólna, Warszawa 2017.
  2. Bąba, M., Zapis na sąd polubowny w sporach z zakresu prawa pracy, “ADR. Arbitraż i Me¬diacja” 2009, No. 4(8).
  3. Bingham, L., Employment arbitration: the repeat player effect, ‘‘Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal’’ 1997, No. 1.
  4. Colvin, A., The growing use of mandatory arbitration. Access to the courts is now bar- red for more than 60 million American workers, 27.09.2017, Economic Policy Institu- te, https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/135056.pdf.
  5. Eisenberg, T. and Hill, E., Arbitration and litigation of employment claims: an empirical comparison, “Dispute Resolution Journal’’ 2003/2004, Vol. 58, No. 4.
  6. Estreicher, S., Saturns for rickshaws: the stakes in the debate over predispute employment arbitration agreements, ‘‘Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution” 2001, Vol. 16, No. 3.
  7. Flaga-Gieruszyńska, K., Sądownictwo polubowne w sprawach z zakresu prawa pracy, in: Góra-Błaszczykowska, A. and Antolak-Szymański, K. (eds.), Pozasądowe sposoby rozwiązywania sporów pracowniczych, Warszawa 2015.
  8. Flejszar, R., Ugodowe rozwiązywanie sporów z zakresu prawa pracy, ‘‘Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej” 2010, No. 1.
  9. Golat, R., Specyfika polubownego rozstrzygania sporów w stosunkach pracowniczych, ‘‘Służba Pracownicza” 2006, No. 9.
  10. Mędrala, M., Zapis na sąd polubowny w sprawach z zakresu prawa pracy, ‘‘Studia z Za-kresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej” 2007, No. 1.
  11. Schmitz, A., Untangling the privacy paradox in arbitration, “University of Kansas Law Review’’ 2006, Vol. 54.
  12. Schwab, S. and Thomas, R., An empirical analysis of CEO employment contracts: what do top executives bargain for?, ‘‘Washington and Lee Law Review’’ 2006, Vol. 63.
  13. Sherwyn, D. (eds.), Assessing the case for employment arbitration: a new path for empiri-cal research, “Stanford Law Review’’ 2005, Vol. 57, No. 4.
  14. Skąpski, M., Ochronna funkcja prawa pracy w gospodarce rynkowej, Kraków 2006.
  15. Szlęzak, A. and Pałubicki, R., Pozasądowe sposoby rozwiązywania sporów pracowniczych. Uwagi ogólne, in: Góra-Błaszczykowska, A. and Antolak-Szymański, K. (eds.), Poza¬sądowe sposoby rozwiązywania sporów pracowniczych, Warszawa 2015.
  16. Thomas, R. et al., Arbitration clauses in CEO employment contracts: an empirical and the- oretical analysis, “Vanderbilt Law Review’’ 2008, Vol. 63, No. 4.
  17. Węgrzyn, A., Sądownictwo polubowne w sporach z zakresu prawa pracy, ‘‘Studia z Zakre¬su Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej’’ 2007, No. 1.