Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

4/2021 (36)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
239
Publications
762
H-index
4
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.03
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 26 2022: 24 2023: 34 2024: 22 2025: 46 2026: 21 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175612
20184712
2019556
20203813
20217626
20228724
20236734
20248522
20255846
20264521

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Wyłączenie pracownika organu w niemieckim postępowaniu administracyjnym


(Disqualification of an authority’s employee in German administrative proceedings)
DOI: 10.18276/ais.2021.36-03
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to perform a comparative legal analysis of the grounds for disqualification of an authority’s employee from participation in German administrative proceedings, procedures and effects thereof, as well as the consequences of violation of provisions concerning disqualification. The formal-dogmatic method is used (an analysis of the provisions regulating the subject matter) as well as the comparative legal method, consisting in comparing solutions adopted in various procedural contexts of a given branch of law and in different legal systems. The author also analyses judicial decisions of the German Federal Administrative Court and the relevant literature. The catalogue of relatives of an authority’s employee who cause his disqualification from participation in the proceedings to which they are parties corresponds to common sentiments better than the catalogue of such persons in the Polish administrative procedure. The issue of disqualification of an employee of an authority on account of his close relationship with a party to the proceedings is regulated by the German legislator, unlike in Poland, in a manner consistent with other situations in which the range of persons belonging to the immediate family (closest relatives) is of legal relevance. The legal consequences of violating provisions on disqualification of an authority’s employee, adopted by the German legislator, fall between two extreme solutions encountered in the legal orders or judicial practice of the European Union Member States.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Bader J., Funke-Kaiser M., Kuntze S., Albedyll J., Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung. Kommentar anhand der höchstrichterlichen Rechtsprechung, Heidelberg 1999.
  2. Brohm W. et al., Administracja Republiki Federalnej Niemiec, przeł. T. Skoczny, Wrocław 1983.
  3. Hufen F., Fehler im Verwaltungsverfahren, Baden-Baden 2002.
  4. Kazele N., Interessenkollisionen und Befangenheit im Verwaltungsrecht, Berlin 1990.
  5. Kmiecik Z.R., Wyłączenie pracownika organu od udziału w ogólnym postępowaniu administracyjnym, Warszawa 2020.
  6. Knack H.J., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz. Kommentar, Köln 1996.
  7. Kopp F.O., Ramsauer U., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, München 2000.
  8. Maier T., Befangenheit im Verwaltungsverfahren. Die Regelungen der EU-Mitgliedstaaten im Rechtsvergleich, Berlin 2001.
  9. Maurer H., Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, München 2006.
  10. Stelkens P., Bonk H.J., Sachs M., Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz. Kommentar, München 2001.
  11. Wahrig G., Deutsches Wörterbuch, Gütersloh 1996.