Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

2/2022 (38)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
260
Publications
752
H-index
4
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 26 2022: 27 2023: 35 2024: 23 2025: 50 2026: 33 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203713
20217626
20228727
20236735
20248523
20255850
20264533

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Zdalny tryb pracy Sejmu i jego organów w czasie stanu epidemii


(Remote mode of working of the Sejm and its official bodies throughout the duration of the pandemic)
DOI: 10.18276/ais.2022.38-08
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic introduced a genuine threat to the possibility of the Sejm conducting its constitutional functions. The pandemic and the necessity of ensuring the safety of the members of the Sejm and employees of the chancellery of the Sejm compelled lawmakers to adopt appropriate legal arrangements in relation to the organisational aspects of the work of the Sejm and its official bodies. The amendment of the Standing Orders of the Sejm passed on March 26th 2020 introduced the possibility of the Sejm’s parliamentary sessions, the Presidium of the Sejm, Council of Seniors, Committees and Subcommittees to take place remotely utilising electronic means of communication. Parliamentary proceedings became conditional not only on the introduction of a state of pandemic, but also one of the states of emergency. The wording of the amendment detailed the new institutions and the legal bases of new procedural solutions (the Standing Orders of the Sejm, Orders of the Marshal of the Sejm) and recognised the practical problems associated with this mode of procedure.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Chybalski P., W sprawie sposobu głosowania podczas posiedzeń komisji bądź podkomisji prowadzonych z wykorzystaniem środków komunikacji elektronicznej umożliwiających porozumiewanie się na odległość, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2020, nr 6.
  2. Gierach E., Uwagi do art. 113, w: M. Safjan, L. Bosek (red.), Konstytucja RP, t. II. Komentarz. Art. 87–243, Warszawa 2016.
  3. Odrowąż-Sypniewski W., Notatka na temat sposobu organizacji posiedzenia Sejmu minimalizującego zagrożenie epidemiczne, 17 marca 2020 r. niepubl.
  4. Radziewicz P., Uwagi do art. 152, w: A. Szmyt (red.), Komentarz do regulaminu Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Warszawa 2018.