Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

2/2025 (53)
OpenAlex statistics

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
292
Publications
762
H-index
4
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.03
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 40 2021: 33 2022: 36 2023: 40 2024: 23 2025: 46 2026: 21 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175612
20184712
2019556
20203840
20217633
20228736
20236740
20248523
20255846
20264521

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)

Umorzenie postanowieniem postępowania karnego ze względu na brak skargi uprawnionego oskarżyciela w sprawie zainicjowanej subsydiarnym aktem oskarżenia


(Discontinuance of criminal proceedings by decision due to lack of a complaint by a legitimate accuser in a case of a subsidiary indictment)
DOI: 10.18276/ais.2025.53-05
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The study analyses the legislative changes made by the Act of 7 July 2023 amending the Act – the Code of Civil Procedure, the Act – the Law on the System of Common Courts, the Act – the Code of Criminal Procedure and some other acts, relating to the institution of subsidiary prosecution, concerning the discontinuation of criminal proceedings due to the lack of a complaint of an authorised accuser by a decision issued at a session or a main hearing. They were related to the introduction of the provisions of Article 339 § 3b and Article 368a to the Code of Criminal Procedure. The aim of the analysis undertaken was to assess the legitimacy of the changes made. The research carried out by the dogmatic-legal method led to the conclusion that the two new articles are inconsistent with each other, and that the changes introduced are unlikely to improve the quality of criminal proceedings conducted following the filing of a subsidiary indictment.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Goss-Przygucka M., Udział prokuratora w postępowaniu wszczętym przez oskarżyciela subsydiarnego po nowelizacji kodeksu postępowania karnego z 15.04.2016 r., „Państwo i Prawo” 2019, nr 4, s. 124–132.
  2. Hermeliński W., Nita-Światłowska B., Prawo pokrzywdzonego do uzyskania statusu oskarżyciela posiłkowego subsydiarnego, „Przegląd Sądowy” 2022, nr 2, s. 23–38.
  3. Stefański R.A., Przegląd uchwał Izby Karnej Sądu Najwyższego w zakresie postępowania karnego za 2013 r., „Ius Novum” 2014, nr 3, s. 101–141.
  4. Świecki D., w: D. Świecki (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz aktualizowany, t. I, LEX/el. 2023.
  5. Zagrodnik J., Udział prokuratora w postępowaniu sądowym wszczętym przez oskarżyciela posiłkowego subsydiarnego, „Prokuratura i Prawo” 2017, nr 2, s. 5–17.