The reviewing procedure of "Autobiography Literature Culture Media":
1. After receiving a text sent by an author the Editorial Staff assess it according to its conformity with the profile of the Journal, formal requirements and language correctness.
2. If the editors-in-chief have accepted the text, it is submitted to a reviewing process.
3. Each article is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers that are not affiliated to the institution represented by the author; the reviewers have been taken from the list published on the Journal’s website.
4. The reviewers do not know the surname or the affiliation of the author, and the author does not know the reviewers’ surnames (the so-called double-blind review process). In other cases the reviewer signs a declaration confirming the absence of any conflict of interest, i.e. confirming the absence of: mutual personal relations between the author and the reviewer (especially relatives up to second degree, or spouses); professional subordination; academic direct cooperation up to two years before.
5. The review must be in written form and include an unequivocal decision whether to accept the article for publication (in the present form or after making the corrections suggested by the reviewer) or reject it.
6. If the reviews are contradictory to each other, the article is sent to another external reviewer. If at least half of the reviews are positive after that stage, the article by virtue of the decision made by the editors-in-chief may be published.
7. The author is notified of the result of the reviews and is allowed to read them.
8. When the authors receive a positive review, they are asked to accept the final version to be published or to make corrections suggested by the reviewers.
9. If there are more than one author, it is necessary to indicate the amount of work put into the article by each of the co-authors, which should be confirmed by a declaration signed by all of them.
10. The author should make a statement that the text submitted has not been published anywhere else.
11. The final decision as to the date of publishing the article is up to the Editors-in-chief.
12. In case of texts written in a foreign language, at least one of the reviewers should be affiliated to a foreign institution from a country other than the one of the author.
The reviewing form and the declaration to download here.
Janina Abramowska
Monika Adamczyk-Garbowska
Anna Artwinska
Arkadiusz Bagłajewski
Omer Bartov
Marian Bielecki
Piotr Bogalecki
Marion Brandt
Zbigniew Chojnowski
Agnieszka Czyżak
Bernadetta Darska
Adam Dziadek
Agata Firlej
Grażyna Gajewska
Jan Galant
Anna Gemra
Daniel Grinberg
Barbara Gutkowska
Imke Hansen
Marcin Jaworski
Arkadiusz Kalin
Jeffrey Koerber
Dorota Kozicka
Bartłomiej Krupa
Hana Kubatova
Joanna Lisek
Sean Martin
Małgorzata Mikołajczak
Tomasz Mizerkiewicz
Anna Mueller
Joanna Nalewajko-Kulikov
Dariusz Nowacki
Joanna Orska
Avinoam Patt
Katarzyna Person
Magdalena Piekara
Magdalena Rabizo-Birek
Magda Rembowska-Płuciennik
Jan Rybak
Elżbieta Rybicka
Katarzyna Sawicka-Mierzyńska
Hanna Serkowska
Jerzy Smulski
Piotr Sobolczyk
Katrin Stoll
Tadeusz Sucharski
Katarzyna Szalewska
Karolina Szymaniak
Wojciech Śmieja
Marcin Telicki
Joanna Tokarska-Bakir
Wojciech Tomasik
Marta Tomczok
Aleksandra Ubertowska
Krzysztof Uniłowski
Izabela Wagner
Błażej Warkocki
Piotr Weiser
Monika Wolting
Marcin Wołk
Grzegorz Wołowiec
Joanna Wójcik
Tomasz Wójcik
Krzysztof Zajas
Sarah E. Zarrow
Tomasz Żukowski
Bernadetta Żynis
