Skip to content

Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia

nr 23
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
191
Publications
302
H-index
3
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.05
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 21 2018: 4 2019: 16 2020: 26 2021: 27 2022: 21 2023: 22 2024: 8 2025: 4 2026: 2 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20172021
2018134
20191616
20202226
20211227
20221021
20231822
2024108
2025124
202602

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

EINE PROZESSUALE ANALYSE VON ELEMENTEN DER BASISDOMÄNEN IM VERGLEICH


(COMPARATIVE PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS OF ELEMENTS CONSTITUTING BASIC DOMAINS)
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The analysis presented in this paper pertains to concepts constituting basic domains, such as time, space, temperature, colour or taste. The subject of analysis are conceptualizations which can arise during the processing of the afore mentioned concepts in the context of the domains themselves as well as of the expressions in which the concepts are contained. The aim of the analysis is to answer the question as to whether all the analysed domains are of homogenous nature or maybe there exist some processual differences between them, and if so, what they are.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (13)
  1. BARTSCH, Renate (2002): Consciousnee Emerging. The Dynamics of Perception, Imagination, Action, Memory, Thought and Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
  2. DROSDOWSKI, Günther/MÜLLER, Wolfgang/SCHOLZE-STUBENRECHT, Werner/WERMKE Matthias (19963): Duden Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. Mannheim.
  3. FAUCONNIER, Gilles/TURNER, Mark (1998): Conceptual integration network. In: Cognitive Science 22 (2), S. 133–187.
  4. LAKOFF, George/JOHNSON, Mark (1980): Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.
  5. LAKOFF, George/TURNER, Mark (1989): More than Cool Reason. Chicago.
  6. LANGACKER, Ronald W. (2009): Gramatyka kognitywna. Kraków.
  7. MAZURKIEWICZ-SOKOŁOWSKA, Jolanta (2014a): Zur Rolle der Konzeptualisierung in Sprachverarbeitungsprozessen am Beispiel des ZEIT-Konzeptes. In: J. Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska, A. Sulikowska, W. Westphal (Hgg.): Konzeptualisierung, Sprache und Diskurs. Hamburg,
  8. MAZURKIEWICZ-SOKOŁOWSKA, Jolanta (2014b): Emotionen in Konzeptualisierungen und ihren Versprachlichungen. In: J. Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska, A. Sulikowska, W. Westphal (Hgg.): Konzeptualisierung, Sprache und Diskurs. Hamburg, S. 35–54.
  9. ROSCH, Eleanor (1975): Cognitive reference points. In: Cognitive Psychology 7, S. 532–547.
  10. SCHWARZ, Monika (1996): Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Tübingen.
  11. SCHWARZ-FRIESEL, Monika (2007): Sprache und Emotion. Tübingen, Basel.
  12. TAYLOR, John (2002): Cognitive Grammar. Oxford.
  13. ZIEM, Alexander (2008): Frames und sprachliches Wissen. Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Berlin.