Skip to content

Przegląd Zachodniopomorski

Przegląd Zachodniopomorski
z. 2 2018
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
203
Publications
891
H-index
4
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.09
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 19 2018: 11 2019: 11 2020: 16 2021: 11 2022: 13 2023: 12 2024: 16 2025: 16 2026: 16 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20174019
20184211
20193111
20203216
20212111
20221913
20232912
20241316
20251916
2026016

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Luźne refleksje o historii sztuki na obszarze muzealnictwa


(Loose Reflections on the History of Arts in the Sphere of Museology)
DOI: 10.18276/pz.2018.2-03
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The history of arts in a museum does not create a theory, but responds to detailed questions. In that way it always remains in direct relations with the core of the structure of the ‘museological sense’. First of all, it accompanies all the stages of creating collections, which include a preliminary analysis to assess acquisitions and a later evaluation of those acquisitions to catalogue them. The questions evident for a museologist are the ones concerning attribution, dating, iconography, technique and technology, stylistic features. The conclusions resulting from such examinations are the basis for the museum expositions. It is the essential aspect of the history of arts in museums. The aims of education in the sphere of the history of arts for the needs of museology might be presented in a similar way. This discipline marks the intellectual, cultural and artistic framework for museums, but it has to be transformed into what is called expertness. Education in museology is twofold, as it is not only the formation of workers (shaping and enriching them), but also the educational activity of the museum directed outwards, towards the audience. The history of arts offers an operational model – first of all – of its own classification according to the chronological and stylistic rules together with a specific universalism, aspiration for a holistic approach. The museum is a place of arts, but from a historical point of view it is one of many places of arts, because throughout the history places of arts were caves, ancient temples, Christian churches, feudal castles, aristocratic palaces, urban tenement houses of the bourgeoisie, auction houses, stores, galleries, artists’ ateliers; and now – just museums, but also universities, whole towns as urbanistic layouts, factories, even individual buildings, conservation workshops, and last but not least the places where the contemporary creator works (a traditional atelier, an office, a computer room, a squat, or whatever else). Each one of them creates a separate – although entwined with others – area, which has its own history of arts and in a way is different from all the others.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Gluziński W., U podstaw muzeologii, Warszawa 1980.
  2. Greenberg C., Obrona modernizmu, Kraków 2006.
  3. Malreaux A., Le Musée Imaginaire, Paris 1997.
  4. Michel P., Peinture et plaisir. Les goûts picturaux des collectionneurs parisiens au XVIIIe siècle, Rennes 2010.
  5. Newhouse V., W stronę nowego muzeum, w: Muzeum sztuki. Antologia, red. M. Popczyk, Kraków 2005.
  6. Pearce S.M., Collection reconsidered, w: Interpreting Objets and Collections, red. S.M. Pearce, London 1994.
  7. Pomian K., Francis Haskell i problem smaku artystycznego, w: Rozważania o smaku artystycznym, red. J. Poklewski, T.F. de Rosset, Toruń 2002.
  8. Pomian K., Zbieracze i osobliwości. Paryż–Wenecja, XVI–XVIII wiek, Warszawa 1996.
  9. Rosset de T.F., Galeria Aleksandra Kokulara i kilka innych kolekcji artystycznych warszawskich malarzy w pierwszej połowie XIX wieku, „Rocznik Historii Sztuki” 2000, t. XXV.
  10. Rosset de T.F, Kolekcja artystyczna: geneza, rozkwit, kryzys, „Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Zabytkoznawstwo i Konserwatorstwo” 2014, t. XLV.
  11. Ryszkiewicz A., Zbiory artystyczne Józefa Kajetana Ossolińskiego. Pierwsza publiczna galeria warszawska, w: A. Ryszkiewicz, Kolekcjonerzy i miłośnicy, Warszawa 1981.