Studia Administracyjne

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Administracyjne

ISSN: 2080-5209     eISSN: 2353-284X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sa.2022.16-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 2(16)|2022
Droga elektroniczna jako wsparcie zasady pisemności
(The electronic way in support of the principle of writtenness)

Authors: Zuzanna Tokarzewska-Żarna ORCID
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: rule of writtenness procedural forms electronic means
Data publikacji całości:2022-12-30
Page range:16 (43-58)
Klasyfikacja JEL: K23
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 384

Abstract

When conducting research on the evolution of the principle of writtenness and the electronic way contained in the Act of 14 June 1960 – Code of Administrative Procedure, the following research problems should be pointed out. Firstly, whether the legislator maintains the conditions for thorough and fast action of the public administration bodies in a given case, using the simplest possible means leading to its settlement. Secondly, whether the changes do not lead to the exclusion of citizens, or a given group from the possibility of participation in the case. Finally, the research problem oscillates around the evaluation of the correctness of functioning of the adopted regulations in the current legal state, including whether they do not raise interpretation doubts or carry negative consequences for people who want to settle their case before a public administration body. Bearing the above in mind, the aim of the research conducted for the purpose of this article was to determine and assess whether the Polish legislator aims to eliminate the principle of writtenness from the administrative procedure. Conducting research in this regard, the following research methods were used: the historical-comparative method, used for the analysis of previously binding legal regulations, the so-called dogmatic-legal method, used for the study of legal provisions regulating the principle of writtenness in administrative proceedings, the empirical method, used for the analysis of judicial decisions, and the theoretical-legal method, used for the analysis of literature.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Borkowski J., (w:) J. Borkowski, J. Jendrośka, R. Orzechowski, A. Zieliński, Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego, Warszawa 1985.
2.Cherka M., (w:) R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski (red.), Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz, wyd. 7, Warszawa 2021 (baza danych Legalis).
3.Dawidowicz W., Ogólne postępowanie administracyjne. Zarys systemu, PWN, Warszawa 1962.
4.Dawidowicz W., Postępowanie administracyjne, PWN, Warszawa 1983.
5.Przybysz P.M., (w:) Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego. Komentarz aktualizowany (baza danych LEX).
6.Wilbrandt-Gotowicz M., (w:) K. Czaplicki, A. Gryszczyńska, M. Świerczyński, K. Świtała, K. Wojsyk, M. Wilbrandt-Gotowicz, Doręczenia elektroniczne. Komentarz, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2021.
7.Wróbel A., (w:) M. Jaśkowska, M. Wilbrandt-Gotowicz, A. Wróbel, Komentarz aktualizowany do Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego (baza danych LEX).