Studia Administracyjne

Wcześniej: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Administracyjne


ISSN: 2080-5209    eISSN: 2353-284X    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/sa.2026.23-04
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS  DOAJ

Lista wydań / 1(23)|2026
Managing Complexity in Electoral Dispute Resolution: Administrative Lessons from Ghana’s 2012 Presidential Election Petition

Autorzy: Kadir Fuseini ORCID
Savelugu, S.H.S

Sulemana Iddrisu ORCID
Tamale College of Education

AbdulKadir Salifu ORCID
Tamale College of Education
Słowa kluczowe: judiciary administration evidence election dispute
Data publikacji całości:2026
Liczba stron:14 (49-62)
Klasyfikacja JEL: K16
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Liczba pobrań ?: 89

Abstrakt

This study analyzes the administrative strategies employed by the Supreme Court of Ghana in managing the 2012 Presidential Election Petition, a highly complex and politically sensitive case. Rather than focusing on constitutional interpretation, the study emphasizes judicial administration, including strict caseflow management, procedural direction, time control, and coordination among legal counsel, political actors, and technical experts. A key innovation was the appointment of independent technical referees, notably KPMG, to audit disputed electoral materials through systematic verification of polling-station pink sheets and voters’ registers. The findings show that active judicial control, structured evidence handling, and careful management of ambiguities were critical in maintaining fairness, efficiency, and legitimacy under intense public scrutiny. The study highlights administrative lessons for electoral dispute resolution, stressing procedural clarity, standardized documentation, defined institutional roles, and the value of combining judicial oversight with technical expertise in emerging democracies.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu

Bibliografia

1.Elklit J., Reynolds A., A Framework for the Systematic Study of Election Quality, Democratization 2005, No. 12(2) https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340500069204
2.Flango V. E., Nardulli P. C., The Role of Social Science Research in Judicial Administration, Justice System Journal 1980, No. 5(1)
3.Gloppen S., Kanyongolo F. E., Courts and the Poor in Malawi: Economic Marginalization, Vulnerability, and the Law, International Journal of Constitutional Law 2007, No. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mom002
4.Hyatt D. C., Mitigating the Threat: A Strategic Checklist for Securing Federal Courthouses, Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University, 2025.
5.Ishola O. T., Towards Change in the Criminal Justice System: Understanding the Challenges of Courtroom Actors, Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2025.
6.Jeuland E., Judicial Case Management: Iura Novit Curia?, (in:) Comparative Civil Procedure, Cheltenham 2025.
7.Kumar D., Singh R. M., Exploring Court Performance and Developing Its Scale, International Journal for Court Administration 2022, No. 13(1)
8.Mateta Z., Exploring Mechanisms of Strengthening Non-Judicial Electoral Dispute Resolution in Zimbabwe, Doctoral dissertation, University of Zimbabwe, 2022.
9.Menkel-Meadow C., Garth B., Process, People, Power and Policy: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure and Courts, (w:) Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, red. P. Cane, H. Kritzer, forthcoming, 2010.
10.Millar P. S., Baar C., Judicial Administration in Canada, Montreal–Kingston 1981.
11.Norris P., Why Electoral Integrity Matters, Cambridge 2014.
12.Örkényi L., Duration of Court Events Required for Litigation – An Empirical Study to Provide a Theoretical Basis for an Objective Measurement System for Judicial Workload, International Journal for Court Administration 2021, No. 12(1), https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.370
13.Oruenjo E. U., Dispute Resolution in Kenya’s 2017 Political Parties Primaries: A Comparative Study of Kenya and Nigeria, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi, 2020.
14.Pradipta A. M., The Position of Election Law in Ensuring Regional Political Justice and Stability, Journal of Law and Humanity Studies 2025, No. 2(1)
15.Ragone Á. P., An Approach and General Overview to Framing the Structure of the Court System and Case Management, (in:) On Judicial Management from Comparative Perspective: International Association of Procedural Law Conference (8–10 November 2017, Tianjin, PRC), Berlin–Heidelberg 2023
16.Roberts J. C., Butcher P., Sherlock A., Nason S., Explanatory Journeys: Visualising to Understand and Explain Administrative Justice Paths of Redress, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2021, No. 28(1).
17.Sela A., Zimerman N., Alberstein M., Judges as Gatekeepers and the Dismaying Shadow of the Law: Courtroom Observations of Judicial Settlement Practices, Harvard Negotiation Law Review 2018, No. 24
18.Song W., Winning Impossible Games? Empirical Analysis on Administrative Litigation between Overseas Enterprises and Administrative Agencies in China, Doctoral dissertation, 2021.
19.Taggart W. A., Mays G. L., Organizational Centralization in Court Administration: An Empirical Assessment, American Journal of Criminal Justice 1987, No. 11(2)
20.Van Ham C., Lindberg S. I., From Sticks to Carrots: Electoral Manipulation in Africa, 1986–2012, Government and Opposition 2015, No. 50(3) https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.6
21.Wheeler R., Empirical Research and the Politics of Judicial Administration: Creating the Federal Judicial Center, Law and Contemporary Problems 1988, No. 51(3)