Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

1/2020 (29)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1
References
0
Citations by year
YearCitations
20221

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
280
Publications
752
H-index
5
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.05
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 27 2022: 28 2023: 38 2024: 24 2025: 60 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203713
20217627
20228728
20236738
20248524
20255860
20264537

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Constructivism as a chance to break deadlock in interdisciplinary research combining international law and international relations

DOI: 10.18276/ais.2020.29-05
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to prove that the theory of constructivism can be an escape from the trap of the constant struggle for influence, which now includes interdisciplinary research combining international law and international relations. For this purpose, the work is divided into three sections. In the first one, the author briefly presents the genesis of in- terdisciplinary research on international law and international relations. In the second part, the sceptical approach of international law researchers towards combined interdisciplinary research is presented. Also in this section, the theory of constructivism is characterised as a potential area for mutual cooperation between international law and international rela¬tions. In the final part, based on the relationship between international humanitarian law and the features of modern weapons, the author tries to prove that the theory of constructiv- ism is perfectly suited to the analysis of contemporary relations between international law and the policies of nations on the international stage.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (22)
  1. international law aspractice, in: d’Aspremont, J. et al. (eds.), International law as a profession, Cambridge 2017.
  2. Armstrong, D. et al., International law and international relations, Cambridge 2007.
  3. Byers, M., Taking the law out of international law: a critique of the iterative perspective, “Harvard International Law Journal” 1997, No. 38(1).
  4. Brunnee, J. and Toope S., Legitimacy and legality in international law: an international account, Cambridge 2011.
  5. Checkel, J.T., Constructivist approaches to European integration, Oslo 2005.
  6. Checkel, J.T., The constructivist turn in international relations theory, Cambridge 1998.
  7. Curanović, A., Konstruktywizm, in: Zięba, R. et al. (eds.), Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2015.
  8. Czaputowicz, J., Teorie Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2008.
  9. Dunoff, J.L. and Pollack, M.A., International law and international relations: introducing an interdisciplinary dialogue, New York 2012.
  10. Hug, T., Constructivism and media socialization concepts and perspectives in German- -speaking countries, “Constructivist Foundations” 2009, No. 2(4).
  11. Klabbers, J., International law, Cambridge 2017.
  12. Klabbers, J., Review of The status of law in world society: meditations on the role and rule of law by Friedrich Kratochwil, “European Journal of International Law” 2015, No. 25(4).
  13. Klabbers, J., The bridge crack’d: a critical look at interdisciplinary relations, “Internatio- nal Relations” 2009, No. 23(1).
  14. Klabbers, J., The relative autonomy of International law or the forgotten politics of interdi- sciplinarity, “Journal of International Law & International Relations” 2004, No. 1(35).
  15. Kolb, R., Advanced introduction to international humanitarian law, Cheltenham 2014.
  16. Koskenniemi, M., The politics of international law, “European Journal of International Law” 1990, No. 20(1).
  17. Koskenniemi, M., The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law 1870-1960, Cambridge 2009.
  18. Kratochwil, F., Rules, norms and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reaso- ning in international relations and domestic affairs, Cambridge 2011.
  19. Onuf, N., World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations, London 2012.
  20. Slaughter, A.M., International law and international relations theory: a dual agenda, “American Journal of International Law” 1993, No. 87(2).
  21. Schmitt, M., Precision attack and international humanitarian law, “International Review of the Red Cross” 2005, No. 87.
  22. Widłak, T., Prawo a konstruktywizm w teorii stosunków międzynarodowych - możliwo¬ści interdyscyplinarnego zbliżenia, in: Bekrycht, T. et al. (eds.), Integracja zewnętrzna i wewnętrzna nauk prawnych, Łódź 2014.