Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

ISSN: 2083-4373     eISSN: 2545-3181    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ais.2024.50-06
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 4/2024 (50)
Carbon tax and plastic levy as examples of tributes that can have an impact on environmental protection

Authors: Katarzyna Kopyściańska ORCID
University of Wrocław
Keywords: CBAM – Carbon Boundary Adjustment Mechanism (carbon tax) European Green Deal Fit for 55 CO2 emissions SUP Single Plastic Use plastic levy
Whole issue publication date:2024-12
Page range:14 (91-104)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:
Downloads ?: 91

Abstract

The basic aim of this article is to examine the benefits and threats for consumers and the environment resulting from the introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (hereinafter: CBAM) and Single Use Plastic (hereinafter: SUP) in the European Union. Due to the too short period of validity of the analyzed regulations, this goal can only be achieved at the level of assessment of the law in force, i.e. by comparing the assumptions of the “originators” of the analyzed regulations with the method of their implementation into Polish regulations, also comparing it with currently biding regulations, such as the CO2 emissions trading mechanism (EU ETS). Climate protection is primarily about reducing the negative impact of human activity on the atmosphere. This impact mainly involves excessive emissions of greenhouse gases into the air in the course of technological processes, such as burning coal to generate electricity. Climate change is a global problem that requires global solutions. As the EU increases its climate ambitions and as less stringent climate policies prevail in many non-EU countries, there is a risk of so-called carbon leakage. Carbon leakage occurs when EU-based companies move carbon-intensive production abroad to countries with less stringent climate policies than in the EU, or when EU products are replaced by imported products with higher carbon emissions. The EU CO2 Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was launched in 2005. Nearly two decades later, were are witnessing the implementation of a solution that has the potential to Based Price Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) heralds a breakthrough tool for imposing a fair price on the carbon emitted in the production of carbon-intensive goods that enter the EU, and for encouraging cleaner industrial production in non-EU countries. The phasing-in of CBAM is aligned with the phasing out of free allocation under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) to support the decarbonisation of EU industry. Nevertheless, a key question should be asked whether CBAM actually shapes a coherent systemic framework for CO2 and whether it does not raise significant doubts regarding its compliance with international agreements binding on the European Union and its economic sense. Moreover, from 1 January 2024, a new fee for single-use plastic products will apply in Poland. The so-called “plastic tax” is another step towards reducing environmental pollution. It aims to encourage consumers to use reusable products and reduce the amount of plastic waste. The article uses the dogmatic-legal method, taking into account current literature and applicable legal regulations.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Brsakoska Bazerkoska J., The European Union and the World Trade Organization: Problems and Challenges, “Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy” 2021, No 7, 10.3935/cyelp.07.2011.122.
2.Caron J., Estimating Carbon Leakage and the Efficiency of Border Adjustments in General Equilibrium – Does Sectoral Aggregation Matter?, “Energy Econ.” 2012, No. 111–126, Vol. 3, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.015.
3.Grzegorczyk F., Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) – Some Reflections on the Background of the European Green Deal, in: A. Pawłowski (ed.), Economy of the Synergy of Economic, Financial and Legal Environmental Law, Warsaw 2022.
4.Hufbauer G.C., Kim J., Can EU Carbon Border Adjustment Measures Propel WTO Climate Talks?. Policy Briefs PB21-23, Washington, DC, 2022.
5.Jakob M., Why Carbon Leakage Matters and What Can Be Done Against It, “One Earth” 2021, No. 609–614, Vol. 4, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.010.
6.Li Y., Carbon Tariffs are Coming! The European Parliament Passes the “Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism” Proposal, Posing Challenges to Many Industries [EB/OL], https://news.cnstock.com/news,bwkx-2021034671469.html.
7.Lim B., Hong K., Yoon J., Chang J.I., Cheong I., Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, “Energies” 2021, No. 147303, 10.3390/en14217303.
8.Matarewicz J., Graniczny podatek węglowy (CBAM) od 1 października 2023 r., LEX/el. 2023, https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/komentarze-praktyczne/granicznypodatek- weglowy-cbam-od-1-pazdziernika-2023-470209421.
9.Mehling M.A., Van Asselt H., Das K., Droege S., Verkuijl C., Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action, “Am. J. Int. Law” 2017, No. 113, pp. 433– 481, 10.1017/ajil.2019.22.
10.Nevalainen A., EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism—Its Purpose and Effects on Carbon Leakage. Bachelor’s Thesis, Aalto University School of Business, Helsinki 2021.
11.Parry I., Simon B., Karlygash Z., Carbon Taxes or Emissions Trading Systems? Instrument Choice and Design, Washington, DC, 2022.
12.Palacková E., Saving Face and Facing Climate Change: Are Border Adjustments a Viable Option to Stop Carbon Leakage?, “Eur. View.” 2019, No. 149–155, Vol. 18, p. 15, 10.1177/1781685819881372.
13.Perdana S., Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism Acceptable and Climate Friendly for Least Developed Countries, “Energy Policy” 2022, No. 113245, Vol. 170, p. 14, 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113245.
14.Ringius L., Torvanger A., Burden Sharing and Fairness Principles in International Climate Policy, “International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics” 2002, No. 2.