Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

1/2026 (57)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
260
Publications
752
H-index
4
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 26 2022: 27 2023: 35 2024: 23 2025: 50 2026: 33 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203713
20217626
20228727
20236735
20248523
20255850
20264533

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Rozprawa z elementami rozprawy zdalnej a rozprawa zdalna jako postulat de lege ferenda w polskim procesie karnym


(A hearing with elements of a remote hearing and the concept of a fully remote hearing as a de lege ferenda proposal)
DOI: 10.18276/ais.2026.57-07
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This article examines the existing legal framework regulating remote participation of various participants in criminal proceedings, including proposed legislative changes. An analysis of the situation of the accused under Article 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shows that while its subsection 1 ensures the right to participate remotely in a hearing, it restricts remote participation to a specific category - accused persons who are deprived of liberty. Going further, remote participation of witnesses is subject to multiple conditions (Article 177 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). Therefore, it was necessary to analyze the potential for amending the current regulations to significantly facilitate remote participation for witnesses, thereby improving procedural efficiency and enhancing the principle of expeditious proceed¬ings. The author has attempted to formulate de lege ferenda proposals for legislative changes concerning remote participation.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Helsińska Fundacja Praw Człowieka, Wdrażanie nowych technologii w wymiarze sprawiedliwości, Warszawa 2021.
  2. Klejnowska M., w: J. Zagrodnik (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2024.
  3. Kulesza C., w: K. Dudka (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2023.
  4. Kulesza C., Rozprawa zdalna oraz zdalne posiedzenie aresztowe w świetle konwencyjnego standardu praw oskarżonego, „Białostockie Studia Prawnicze” 2021, nr 3.
  5. Kurowski M., w: D. Świecki (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz aktualizowany, t. I, LEX/el. 2024.
  6. Marko D., Zdalny udział podejrzanego w posiedzeniu aresztowym w świetle standardu habeas corpus, „Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2024, nr 2.
  7. Misztal P., Udział oskarżonego w posiedzeniach, w: D. Świecki (red.), Meritum. Postępowanie karne, Warszawa 2023.
  8. Sychta K., w: J. Zagrodnik (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2024.
  9. Świecki D., w: D. Świecki (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz aktualizowany, t. I, LEX/el. 2024.