Polski samorząd województwa po Traktacie Lizbońskim – analiza politologiczna i prawna

Tomasz Czapiewski

Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

Currently: Acta Politica Polonica

OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations: 214
Publications: 252
H-index: 5
I10-index: 1
Mean citedness (2 years): 0.38

Citations received by year

Show data table

Citations received by year
Year	Publications	Citations
2017	33	9
2018	29	8
2019	17	7
2020	15	7
2021	16	24
2022	21	21
2023	13	37
2024	20	33
2025	19	28
2026	6	37

Data retrieved: 05.11.2026

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex

Google Scholar

Find in Google Scholar

Polski samorząd województwa po Traktacie Lizbońskim – analiza politologiczna i prawna

(Polish regional authorities in European Union after the Lisbon Treaty – political and judicial analysis)

Cite

Bibliographic reference

Tomasz Czapiewski. (2012). Polski samorząd województwa po Traktacie Lizbońskim – analiza politologiczna i prawna. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica. 1/2012 (25). 65-79

The full text is not available in this service

ISSN:	0867-0617
Authors:	Tomasz Czapiewski Instytut Politologii i Europeistyki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords:	regional authorities, Lisbon Treaty, European Union, decentralization
Issue / book publication date:	2012
Page range:	15 (65-79)
OAI-PMH:	Metadata

Abstract

The aim of the article is to describe the position and activities of polish voivodeship in the structure of Poland and European Union. Reform carried in Poland years 1997–1999 resulted in decentralized structure and quite independent regions, even in comparison to other EU countries. Voivodeships were beneficients of european integration’sprocess, mostly because of cohesion policy. Activity in order to promote economic equality between regions does not mean that regions are important actors in initiation and formulation of UE policies. Lisbon Treaty can be viewed as another small step in increasing regions’ role in the political system of European Union, but still EU is organisation of countries.

Bibliography

Arzaghi M., Henderson J., Why countries are fiscally decentralizing, „Journal of Public Economics” 2005, t. 89, nr 7.
Burgess M., Federalism and European Union: Political Ideas, Influences, and Strategies in the European Community 1972–1986, London 2002.
Izdebski H., Samorząd terytorialny. Podstawy ustroju i działalności, Warszawa 2009.
Marks G., Hooghe L., Schakel A.H., Measuring Regional Authority, „Regional and Federal Studies” 2008, t. 18, nr 2–3.
Molenda R., Marszałek Geblewicz doradcą w UE, http://www.radio.szczecin.pl/index. php?idp=1&idx=77926
Program prac Sieci Monitorującej Stosowanie Zasady Pomocniczości na rok 2011 przyjęty przez Prezydium KR-u 4 marca 2011 r.; http://portal.cor.europa.eu/subsidiarity/SiteCollectionocuments/Work%20programme%202011/Subsidiarity%20Annual%20Report%202010_ann1_corr1_cdr57_A3857_11_pl.pdf
Protokół 2 w sprawie stosowania zasad pomocniczości i proporcjonalności do Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 310/207,16.12.2004.
Skawiński F., Reprezentacja interesów regionów w Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2008.
Tomaszewski K., Regiony w procesie integracji europejskiej, Kraków 2007.
Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 83, 30.03.2010, bookshop.europa.eu/is bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/EU-Bookshop-Site/pl_PL/-/EUR/ViewPublication-Start?PublicationKey=FXAC10083