Skip to content

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media
nr 1 (22) 2024
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
130
Publications
321
H-index
5
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 0 2019: 4 2020: 6 2021: 17 2022: 16 2023: 23 2024: 16 2025: 29 2026: 16 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017312
2018260
2019304
2020316
20213017
20222516
20233423
20242716
20252929
2026016

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Doing Research in Times of Crisis. An Auto/biography

DOI: 10.18276/au.2024.1.22-06
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2353-8694
eISSN:2719-4361
Authors: Aneta Ostaszewska ORCID
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Keywords: auto/biography research academia experience sweaty concept
Issue / book publication date:2024
Page range:14 (71-84)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Diamond Discovery Hub
QR code

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the process of struggling with thoughts, emotions and experiences that emerged in the course of and as a result of my research during the Covid-19 pandemic. By referring to Liz Stanley’s notion of “auto/biography,” I strive to explore the meanings and implications of researching a researcher’s autobiography. I am interested in the epistemic discussion on the interrelationship of what is personal, political and/or institutional in the context of feminist studies. My aim is to reflect on such issues as the effect of research on the trajectory of my own auto/biography.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (36)
  1. Acker, Sandra. “In/out/side: Positioning the researcher in feminist qualitative research.” Resources for Feminist Research, 28, no. 1-2 (2000). link.gale.com/apps/doc/A80881203/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=e3a3b29b.
  2. Ahmed, Sara. Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press, 2017.
  3. Ahmed, Sara. “Introduction: Sexism – A Problem with a Name.” new formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics 86 (2015): 5-13. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/604486.
  4. Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands La Frontiera: the New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books, 1987.
  5. Bell, Viki. Feminist Imagination. Genealogies in Feminist Theory. Sage, 2000.
  6. Chadwick, Rachel. “On the politics of discomfort.” Feminist Theory, 22, no. 4 (2021): 556-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120987379.
  7. Cotterill, Pamela & Gayle Letherby. “Weaving Stories: Personal Auto/Biographies in Feminist Research.” Sociology, 27, no. 1 (1983): 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700107.
  8. Denzin, Norman K. “The reflexive interview and a performative social science.” Qualitative Research, 1, no. 1 (2001): 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100102.
  9. Geertz, Clifford. “Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought.” The American Scholar, 49, no. 2 (1980): 165–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41210607.
  10. Griffin, Gabriele, Katarina Hamberg, and Britta Lundgren, eds. The Social Politics of Research Collaboration. Routledge, 2013.
  11. Griffin, Gabriele Annelie Bränström-Öhman, Hildur Kalman, eds. The Emotional Politics of Research Collaboration. Routledge, 2013.
  12. Hall, Richard. The Alienated Academic: The Struggle for Autonomy Inside the University. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
  13. Hanisch, Carole. “The Personal Is Political.” In: Notes from the Second Year. Women’s Liberation. Major Writings of the Radical Feminists, edited by Shulamith Firestone and Anne Koedt. Radical Feminism, 1970.
  14. Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.
  15. Hemmings, Clare. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory, 12, no. 2 (2012): 147–161.
  16. Hochschild, Arlie Russell. “Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.” American Journal of Sociology, 85, no. 3 (1979): 551-575.
  17. Howlett, Marnie. “Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic.” Qualitative Research, 22, no. 3 (2022): 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.
  18. Kaplan, Ann E. “Is the Gaze Male?” In: Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, edited by Ann Snitow, Christine Stansell and Sharon Thompson. Methuen, 1983.
  19. Letherby, Gayle. Feminist research in theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, 2003.
  20. Maisuria, Alpesh and Svenja Helmes. Life for the Academic in the Neoliberal University. Routledge, 2019.
  21. Nicotera, Anne Maydan. “The Woman Academic as Subject/Object/Self: Dismantling the Illusion of Duality.” Communication Theory, 9, no. 4 (1999): 430–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00207.x.
  22. Ortiz-Vilarelle, Lisa. “(Life) Writing to Belong: Teaching and Learning on Camera during a Pandemic.” a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 37, no. 3 (2022): 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154450.
  23. Ostaszewska, Aneta. Becoming bel hooks. A story about the self-empowerment of a Black girl who became a feminist. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2023.
  24. Ostaszewska, Aneta, Marta Pietrusińska. ”Wywiad online jako nowa rzeczywistość badawcza w kontekście badań nad feminizacją pandemii.” Studia Socjologiczne, 3, no. 250 (2023): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.147160.
  25. Pérez, Caroline Criado. Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Vintage Books, 2020.
  26. Reinharz, Shulamit. On Becoming a Social Scientist: From Survey Research and Participant Observation to Experimental Analysis. Routledge, 1984.
  27. Richardson, Laurel. Fields of Play. Rutgers University Press, 1997.
  28. Rodak, Paweł. Między zapisem a literaturą. Dziennik polskiego pisarza w XX wieku. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2011.
  29. Rose, Gillian. “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics.” Progress in Human Geography, 21, no. 3 (1997): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122.
  30. Smith, Sidonie and Julia Watson. Interfaces: Women/Autobiography/Image/ Performance. University of Michigan Press, 2009.
  31. Stanley, Liz. The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester University Press, 1992.
  32. Stanley, Liz and Sue Wise. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.
  33. Staude, John-Raphael. “Autobiography as a Spiritual Practice.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 45, no. 3 (2005): 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v45n03_01.
  34. Steier, Frederick. Research and Reflexivity. Sage, 1991.
  35. Taylor, Yvette, Kinneret Lahad, eds., Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64224-6_1.
  36. Till, Karen E. “Returning home and to the field.” Geographical Review 91 (2001): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250804.