Skip to content
Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług

nr 120 2015
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
2
References
21
Citations by year
YearCitations
20191
20231

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
2

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
2

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.4018/978-1-5225-9936-4.ch012 (2020)
  2. 10.4018/978-1-6684-6835-7.ch010 (2023)
View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Strategia połączeń niskokosztowych i hybrydowych linii lotniczych: czy Ryanair jest wyjątkowy?


(Network strategies of European low cost and hybrid(ized) airlines: Is Ryanair unique?)
DOI: 10.18276/epu.2015.120-09
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The paper analyses network strategies of eleven European low cost and hybrid(ized) airlines between 2009 and 2014 focusing on spatial (geographical) attributes. Two-dimensional description of airline network evolution identified three of four possible spatial network strategies which were followed by the airlines — expansion, contraction and condensation; revealing expansion as a prevailing one. Ryanair as an expanding airline increased transnational nature of its network (confirmed by geographical spread indices), however out of the EEA region Ryanair expanded least within the expanding airlines. Against the compared expanding counterparts, the only Ryanair increased exploitation of its network connectivity potential. Ryanair had the lowest levels of network concentration what coincides with an assumption about deconcentrated network typical for pure (ultra) low cost carrier. Our findings support the statement that economies generated by spatial connectivity of airline networks play a crucial role in competition of airlines as their business is in principle spatially determined.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (24)
  1. European Commission, 2013. Annual Analysis of the EU Air Transport Market, 2011.
  2. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/internal_market/observatory_market/doc/annual-2011-summary.pdf
  3. Belobaba P. et al., 2009. The Global Airline Industry. Wiltshire: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Burghouwt G. et al., 2003. The spatial configuration of airline networks in Europe. Journal of Air Transport Management 9, 309-323.
  5. Dobruszkes F., 2006. An analysis of European low-cost airlines and their networks. Journal of Transport Geography 14, 249-264.
  6. Dobruszkes F., 2013. The geography of European low-cost airline networks: a contemporary analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 28, 75-88.
  7. Dudas G., 2010. Low Cost Airlines in Europe: Network Structure after the Enlargement of the European Union. Geographica Pannonica 14/2, 49-58.
  8. Reggiani A. et al., 2011. Connectivity and Concentration in Airline Networks: A Complexity Analysis of Lufthansa’s Network. TI 2011-111/3 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
  9. Müller K. et al., 2012. The Construction of a Low Cost Airline Network: Facing competition and exploring new markets. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 11-052. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp11052.pdf
  10. OECD, 2014. Airline Competition. Background Paper by the Secretariat. DAF/COMP(2014/14).
  11. Burghouwt G. — de Wit J., 2003. The Temporal Configuration of European Airlines Networks.
  12. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guillaume_Burghouwt/publication/222829757_Temporal_configurations_of_European_airline_networks/links/0c96051c05f63b67f6000000.pdf
  13. ICAO, 2014. List of LCC based on ICAO definition. http://www.icao.int/sustainability/Documents/LCC-List.pdf
  14. Klophaus R. et al., 2012. Low cost carriers going hybrid: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Air Transport Management 23, 54-58.
  15. Huettinger M., 2006. Air Baltic and SAS — a case study in the European airline industry. Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 1 Iss: 2, pp. 227-244.
  16. Vidovic A. et al., 2013. Development of Business Models of Low Cost Airlines. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 3(1), 69-81.
  17. NAIR, S.K.S. et al., 2011. The Analysis of Airline Business Models in the Development of Possible Future Business Options. World Journal of Management 3 No. 1. 48-59.
  18. Scholz A.B., 2011. Spatial Network Configurations of Cargo Airlines. Working Papers in Economics, No 20, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.
  19. Gillen D., 2006. Airline Business Models and Networks: Regulation, Competition and Evolution in Aviation Markets. Review of Network Economics 5/4, 366-385.
  20. Mason J.K., Morrison W.G., 2008. Towards a means of consistently comparing airline business models with an application to the ‘low cost’ airline sector. Research in Transportation Economics 24, 75-84.
  21. Reynolds-Ferighan A.J., 2010. Characterisation of airline networks: a North American and European Comparison. Journal of Air Transport Management 16, 109-120.
  22. Daft J., Alberts S., 2012. A conceptual framework for measuring airline business model convergence. Working Paper. Department of Business Policy and Logistics, University of Cologne, No.110.
  23. Lohmann G., KOO, T.T.R., 2013. The airline business model spectrum. Journal of Air Transport Management 31, 7-9.
  24. UNCTAD, 2014. Geographical Spread Index. http://unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs/WIR11_web%20tab%2031.pdf