Skip to content
Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski

Poland's Demographic Past

46, 2024
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
277
Publications
174
H-index
5
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.18
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 7 2018: 22 2019: 20 2020: 22 2021: 10 2022: 30 2023: 33 2024: 30 2025: 44 2026: 27 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017177
20181322
20191020
20201022
2021310
2022430
2023933
2024730
20251044
2026027

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Family Composition of Samogitian Peasants and Odnodvortsy based on Inventories from the Middle of the 19th Century

DOI: 10.18276/pdp.2024.46-03
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The article analyzes the composition of peasant and odnodvortsy family households in mid-19th-century Samogitia (Raseiniai, Šiauliai and Telšiai districts), based on data from the 1845–1856 Imperial Russian stateowned estate inventories. Using Laslett and Hammel’s (1974) typology, widely used in historical demography, families were classified as solitaries, no family, nuclear, extended and multiple-family households. In order to identify the factors that determined family composition, families were classified based on their social category (peasant or odnodvortsy families) as well as their economic status (tyaglye (serfs), polutyaglye (semi-indentured laborers), ogrodniki (plot-holders) and bobyl‛i (land- less people)). The empirical analysis showed that families of both social categories and all the economic categories tended to have a nuclear structure, except for the serf peas- ants and semi-indentured peasants, among whom there was no single dominant family type. The distinguishing feature of these social categories was determined by having a sufficient amount of land for self-sustenance and the living conditions associated with serfdom
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Dennison, Tracy. “Household Formation, Institutions, and Economic Development: Evidence from Imperial Russia.” The History of the Family 16, no. 1 (2012): 456–65.
  2. Hajnal, John. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” In Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography. Vol. 1, General and Great Britain, ed. David Edward Charles Eversley. Edward Arnold, 1965.
  3. Jablonskis, Konstantinas, and Juozas Jurginis. Lietuvos valstiečiai XIX amžiuje. Valstybinė politinės ir mokslinės literatūros leidykla, 1957.
  4. Kabuzan, Vladimir Maksimovič. Narodonaselenie Rosii v XVIII – pervoj polovine XIX v. Akademiâ nauk SSSR, 1963.
  5. Kerzer, David, and Richard Saller. The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present. Yale University Press, 1991.
  6. Kuklo, Cezary. The Population of the Holy Cross Parish in Warsaw in the 18th Century. Institute for the Research of European Cultural Heritage, 2016.
  7. Laslett, Peter. “Introduction: The History of the Family.” In Household and Family in Past Time, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge University Press, 1974.
  8. Maslauskaitė, Aušra, Dalia Leinartė, and Irma Dirsytė. “Praeities šeimos: ar XIX a. vidu- rio Lietuvai buvo būdinga vakarietiška namų ūkio struktūra?” Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 49, no. 1 (2021): 7–33.
  9. Őri, Péter. “Long-Term Demographic Change and Local Socio-Cultural Patterns: Marriages and Household Structure in 18–20th-Century Hungary.” Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski – Poland’s Demographic Past 37, no. 3 (2015): 7–37.
  10. Plakans, Andrejs. “Family Enterprise in the Baltic Estate Economy: The Nineteenth Cen- tury.” The History of the Family 6, no. 1 (2001): 241–56.
  11. Plakans, Andrejs. “Migration, Households, and Agrarian Reform in the Baltic Province of Russia: 19th and 20th Centuries.” The History of the Family 11, no. 1 (2006): 151–59.
  12. Sarcevičienė, Jolita. “Cykle życia jednostki i rodziny: na przykładzie chłopów litewskich w XVIII wieku.” In Grupy społeczne i ich wpływ na rozwój społeczeństwa w XVI– XIX wieku, ed. Tamara Bairašauskaitė. Lietuvos istorijos instituto leidykla, 2015.
  13. Szołtysek, Mikolaj. “Central European Household and Family Systems and the ‘Hajnals-Mit- terauer’ Line: The Parish of Bujakow (18th–19th Centuries).” The History of the Fam- ily 12, no. 1 (2007): 19–40.
  14. Szołtysek, Mikolaj. Rethinking East-Central Europe: Family Systems and Co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Vol 1, Contexts and Analyses. Peter Lang, 2015.
  15. Szołtysek, Mikolaj. Rethinking East-Central Europe: Family Systems and Co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Vol. 2, Quality Assessments, Documentation, and Bibliography. Peter Lang, 2015.
  16. Višnâuskajte, Angele. Razvitie litovskoj krestânskoj semʹi. Nauka, 1964.
  17. Vyšniauskaitė, Angelė. “Valstiečių šeimos demografiniai bruožai ir organizacija XVIII– XX a. I pusėje.” In Lietuvių šeima ir papročiai, ed. Angelė Vyšniauskaitė, Petras Kalnius and Rasa Paukštytė. Mintis, 2008.