Skip to content

Rocznik Komparatystyczny

Rocznik Komparatystyczny
15 (2024)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
174
Publications
237
H-index
5
I10-index
3
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.15
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 4 2019: 24 2020: 43 2021: 18 2022: 12 2023: 13 2024: 18 2025: 13 2026: 14 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017202
201804
20191724
20203243
20211418
20221612
20231613
20241318
2025013
2026014

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Retributivism Gone Mad: Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure”

DOI: 10.18276/rk.2024.15-03
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Measure for Measure is ostensibly a comedy (no one dies, and the main penalties at the play’s end are, hilariously, requiring marriage), but it is a much darker comedy than any other Shakespeare wrote written after Hamlet, retaining features of that play’s moral nihilism. Its nihilism takes the form of a criticism of the claims of strong retributivism as a basis for criminal justice, namely, that it is necessary and sufficient for punishment that there be a moral wrong, and the nature of punishment is to be determined by the nature of the wrong (thus, death for killing). The play focusses on the criminalization of two forms of consensual sex: the commercial sex business of Mistress Overdone and Pompey, her servant, and the non-commercial loving sex of Claudio with Juliet, now pregnant, who shortly intend to marry. The play questions the first comically, the second tragically. The article explores the play’s indictment of strong retributivism, and charts a path to an alternative, namely, restorative justice.
Preview PDF

Open PDF