Skip to content

Studia Administracyjne

Studia Administracyjne

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Administracyjne

1(13)|2021
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
74
Publications
225
H-index
3
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.25
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 0 2018: 0 2019: 1 2020: 3 2021: 10 2022: 13 2023: 19 2024: 12 2025: 11 2026: 5 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017140
2018140
2019101
202083
20211810
20221613
20231619
20241812
20251511
202675

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Institution of taxing discretion: between tax law and taxing arbitrariness

DOI: 10.18276/sa.2021.13-01
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Taxing discretion disrupts the dichotomous nature of tax law provisions, especially if it concerns tax liabilities. This institution may even be considered arbitrary and deemed not applicable in the Czech Republic. An analysis of English and German law indicates that taxing discretion is inevitable but may be effectively limited, e.g. by introducing a legal doctrine stating that exercise of taxing discretion is bound by the purposes of an act of Parliament granting taxing discretion and by judicial review. In the Czech Republic, taxing discretion is limited by administrative guidelines and judicial review, but further improvements are advisable. This would allow to reintroduce tax cancellation based on taxing discretion into Czech law.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Bakeš, M. (ed.), Finanční právo [Financial Law]. Praha 2012.
  2. Baxa, J. (ed.), Daňový řad: Komentář [Tax Ordinance. Commentary]. Praha 2011.
  3. Bodden, G., Steuergerechtigkeit im Billigkeitsverfahren nach § 163 AO [Tax justice in tax cancellation procedure], Deutsches Steuerrecht 2016, no. 30.
  4. Boňek, V., Ještě jednou k prominutí daně a jejího příslušenství [Once more about tax and its incidental dues cancellation], Daňový expert [Tax Expert] 2008, no. 5.
  5. De Cogan, D., Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law, in Evans, Ch., Freedman, F. (eds.), The Delicate Balance: Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam 2011.
  6. Eden, S., Judicial Control of Tax Negotiation, eJournal of Tax Research 2005, no. 5.
  7. Elliott, M. and Varuhas, J.N.E. (eds.), Administrative Law: Text and Materials. Oxford 2017.
  8. Freedman, J., HMRC’s Management of the U.K. Tax System: The Boundaries of Legitimate Discretion, in Evans, Ch., Freedman, J. (eds.), The Delicate Balance. Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam 2011.
  9. Hendrych, D. (ed.), Správní právo. Obecná část [Administrative Law. General Part]. Praha 2011.
  10. Klein, F. (ed.), Abgabenordnung – einschließlich Steuerstrafrecht [Fiscal Code – including Criminal Tax Law]. München 2016.
  11. Koenig, U. (ed.), Abgabenordnung: §§ 1 bis 368. Kommentar [Fiscal Code: §§ 1 to 368. Commentary]. München 2014.
  12. Law, J., Oxford Dictionary of Accounting. New York 2016.
  13. Spirit, M., Úvod do studia práva [Introduction to legal study]. Praha 2010.
  14. Tipke, K. (ed.), Steuerrecht. Ein systematischer Grundriß [Tax Law: A Systematic Layout]. Köln 1991.
  15. Tipke, K. and Kruse, H.W. (eds.), Abgabenordnung. Finanzgerichtsordnung. Kommentar [Fiscal Code and Code of Procedure for Fiscal Courts: Commentary]. Köln 2014.
  16. Turpin, C., British Government and the Constitution: Text, Cases and Materials. London 2013.
  17. Williams, D. et al., Davies: Principles of Tax Law. London 2016.