Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

2/2024 (48)
OpenAlex statistics

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
292
Publications
762
H-index
4
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.03
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 40 2021: 33 2022: 36 2023: 40 2024: 23 2025: 46 2026: 21 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175612
20184712
2019556
20203840
20217633
20228736
20236740
20248523
20255846
20264521

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)

Legal protection of persons with reduced mobility in international air transport

DOI: 10.18276/ais.2024.48-01
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This paper examines air transport regulations from the perspective of persons with disabilities including persons with reduced mobility (PRM). The air transport sector has been the most advanced in terms of regulations that allow all passengers regardless of their disability to travel without barriers. In this regard, the author analyses European and US regulations that are prevalent in international air transport. The definition of PRM has been broader in transport regulations than in other regulations dealing with the rights of persons with disabilities. The rights of PRM have not been covered by an international treaty. The author identifies and examines some aspects that may have given rise to conflicts of law in international transport by air where at least two jurisdictions are involved. To do so, the comparative method of legal research has been applied, but the investigation of the law in force has helped to examine some nuances in terminology, including the definition of PRM.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Ambrożuk D., Problematyka prawna przewozu osób niepełnosprawnych oraz osób o ograniczonej sprawności ruchowej, “PTiL” 2017, No. 3(39), pp. 151–160.
  2. Chodakowska M., Kulturowe uwarunkowania postaw wobec inwalidztwa oraz osób niepełnosprawnych. Ciąglość i możliwość zmiany, in: M. Chodakowska (ed.), Człowiek niepełnosprawny. Charisteria dla Profesor Zofii Sękowskiej, Lublin 1994.
  3. Fraser, Order Under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) and 42 Code of Federal Health Regulations 70.2, 71.31(b), 71.32(b): Requirement for Persons to Wear Masks While On Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs, 29 January 2021, https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/archival-collection/centers-disease-control-prevention-6318/order-section-361-public-health-service-act-42-usc-264-42-code-federalhealth-regulations-702-7131-b-7132-b-615310.
  4. Kanter A.S., The Development of Disability Rights Under International Law. From Charity to Human Rights, New York 2015.
  5. Paluszkiewicz M., Prawne pojęcie niepełnosprawności, “Studia Prawno–Ekonomiczne” 2015, Vol. XCV, pp. 77–98.
  6. Szabłowska–Juckiewicz M., Zatrudnianie osób niepełnosprawnych – ocena rozwiązań w prawie polskim z perspektywy międzynarodowych i unijnych standardów, “Studia Prawnoustrojowe” 2015, No. 28, pp. 2015–234.
  7. Wodecki P., Ewolucja sposobów rozumienia pojęcia niepełnosprawności, “Niepełnosprawność – zagadnienia, problemy, rozwiązania” 2020, No. 1(34), pp. 108–109.