Skip to content

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe. Roczniki Prawnicze

3/2025 (54)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
280
Publications
752
H-index
5
I10-index
2
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.05
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 12 2018: 12 2019: 6 2020: 13 2021: 27 2022: 28 2023: 38 2024: 24 2025: 60 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
20175412
20184712
2019546
20203713
20217627
20228728
20236738
20248524
20255860
20264537

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Rola prokuratora w znowelizowanym Kodeksie postępowania karnego – analiza krytyczna


(The role of the prosecutor in the amended Code of Criminal Procedure – a critical analysis)
DOI: 10.18276/ais.2025.54-08
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present a historical analysis of the determinants of development of the modern judiciary and prosecutor’s office and their role, both in society as a whole and strictly in criminal proceedings, as well as to analyse of the role of the prosecutor in the criminal process, both as a model and in the context of recent normative changes. The author analyzes the amendments to criminal law that have taken place in recent years, pointing out that they have resulted in a significant expansion of the prosecutor’s competences in criminal proceedings, especially at the stage of jurisdictional proceedings, where he took over some of the powers previously reserved for the court. The author criticizes these changes from the point of view of compliance with the conventional model of a fair trial, pointing out that these changes are part of a broader normative context of a general move towards greater punitiveness of criminal law, which can be observed in recent years. The article is a written version of the speech delivered by the author during a scientific conference.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Eichstaedt K., w: D. Świecki (red.), Kodeks postępowania karnego, t. I, Komentarz aktualizowany, LEX/el. 2023.
  2. Hofmański P., Wróbel A., w: L. Garlicki (red.), Konwencja o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności, t. 1, Komentarz do artykułów 1–18, Warszawa 2010.
  3. Grubalska A., Sprzeciwienie się prokuratora a sprzeciw w procesie karnym, „Przegląd Sądowy” 2023, nr 3, s. 47–59.
  4. Koranyi K., Powszechna historia państwa i prawa, t. 1, Warszawa 1966.
  5. Kucharski R., Zarys historii Prokuratury w Polsce, „Prokuratura i Prawo” 2021, nr 11, s. 121–160.
  6. Nowicki M.A., Wokół Konwencji Europejskiej. Komentarz do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka, Warszawa 2021.
  7. Ponikowski B., Kwestia państwa we współczesnej myśli politycznej, w: A.W. Jabłoński, L. Sobkowiak (red.), Studia z teorii polityki, t. II, Wrocław 1998, s. 53–78.
  8. Ponikowski B., Zagrodnik J., w: J. Skorupka (red.) Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2023.
  9. Sakowicz A., Zabłocki S., Standard konstytucyjny i konwencyjny a warunkowe tymczasowe aresztowanie (art. 257 § 2 i 3 k.p.k.), „Przegląd Sądowy” 2021, nr 10, s. 26–55.
  10. Sójka-Zielińska K., Historia prawa, Warszawa 2011.
  11. Weber M., Polityka jako zawód i powołanie, w: M. Weber, Racjonalność, władza, odczarowanie, tłum. M. Holona, A. Kopacki, Poznań 2011, s. 267–322.