Acta Politica Polonica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

ISSN: 2451-0432    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/ap.2018.46-01
CC BY-SA   Open Access   DOAJ  ERIH PLUS

Issue archive / 4/2018 (46)
Peculiarities of Power Transformation in the Modern Georgia

Authors: Irakli Kakhidze
Keywords: power information society meritocracy social media electronic media
Data publikacji całości:2018
Page range:9 (5-13)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:

Abstract

The most significant technological processes which began from the 2nd half of the 20th century and were followed by a significant increase of the role of information, changes in all areas of social life, led to transformation of power relations. The above-mentioned phenomenon was demonstrated by introduction of social media, enhancement of mechanisms of social involvement in the decision-making process and introduction of electronic democracy. There is a difference of opinions in connection with the above-mentioned transformation results among the modern scientists which is expressed in the form of narratives of „cyber optimist” and „cyber pessimist” researchers. In this regard, peculiarities of power transformation in Georgia and its socio-political results are addressed in the article.
Download file

Article file

Bibliography

1.Albrecht, S., Kohlrausch, N., Kubicek, H., Lippa, B., Märker, O., Trénel, M., Vorwerk, V., Westholm, H., Wiedwald, Ch. (2008). eParticipation – Electronic Participation of Citizens and the Business Community in eGovernment. Retrie¬ved from: https://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/study_e-participation_engl.pdf (17.09.2018).
2.Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
3.Booth, P. (2010). Digital Fandom. New Media Studies. New York: Peter Lang.
4.Boyd, D. (2008). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites. The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. Cam¬bridge: MIT Press.
5.Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social Network Sites. Definition, History, and Scholarship. Retrieved from: https:// www.danah.org/papers/JCMCIntro.pdf (17.09.2018).
6.Caldwell, M., Henry, P. (2005). Celebrity Worship, Micro-Communities and Consumer Well-Being. Retrieved from: http://neumann.hec.ca/aimac2005/PDF_Text/CaldwellM_HenryP.pdf (17.09.2018).
7.Castells, M. (2006). The Informational Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Chichester–Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.Chadwick, E. (2018). E-democracy. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/e-democracy (17.09.2018).
9.Charkviani, T. (2014). Neo-Patrimonial and Meritocratic Governance Strategies in a Transformable Public Service. Tbilisi: Ilia University.
10.Cohen, H. (2011). Social Media Definition. Retrieved from: https://heidicohen.com/social-media-definition/ (17.09.2018).
11.Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication. Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication, 2 (22), 147–162. DOI: 10.1080/10584600590933160.
12.Earl, J., Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change. Activism in the Internet Age. American Journal of So¬ciology, 6 (117), 1830–1832. DOI: 10.1086/664817.
13.Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., Steinfield, Ch.W. (2009). Social Network Sites and Society. Current Trends and Future Possi¬bilities. Interactions, 1 (16), 6–9. DOI: 10.1145/1456202.1456204.
14.Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. London: Tavistock.
15.Hodkinson, P. (2011). Media, Culture and Society. An Introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.
16.Karvalics, L.Z. (2009). Information Society Dimensions. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/652113/Informa¬tion_Society_Dimensions (17.09.2018).
17.Mackay, H., O’Sullivan, T. (1999). The media Reader. Continuity and Transformation. London: Sage.
18.Manifest.ge (2018). Retrieved from: https://manifest.ge/main/item/357 (17.09.2018).
19.Masuda, Y. (1980). The Information Society as Post-industrial Society. Washington: Transaction Publishers.
20.Meyer, T. (2002). Media Democracy. How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21.Murinska Gaile, S. (2013). The Role and Functions of Social Media in Modern Society. Is Social Media Worthwile for Local Media? Journalism Research, 6, 43–62.
22.Papathanassopoulos, S. (ed.) (2011). Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.
23.Rosen, Ch. (2007). Virtual Friendship and New Narcissizm. The New Atlantis, 1 (17), 15–31.
24.Rostiashvili, K. (2010). E-Governance in Georgia: World Tendencies. Retrieved from: https://idfi.ge/ge/e-governance¬-in-georgia-world-tendencies (17.09.2018).
25.Transparency.ge (2018). Retrieved from: http://www.transparency.ge/ge/post/sazogadoebrivi-azris-kvleva-korupcia-nd oba-institutebis-mimart-da-sajaro-politikis-sakitxebi (17.09.2018).
26.Torres-Soriano, M. (2013). Internet as a Driver of Political Change. Cyber-Pesimists and Cyber-optimists. Journal of the Spanish Institute of Strategic Studies. Retrieved from: revista.ieee.es/index.php/ieee/article/download/40/68 (17.09.2018).
27.Tsuladze, L., Berdzenishvili, A., Esebua, F., Kakhidze, I., Macharadze, N., Kvintradze, A., Kldiashvili, D. (2013). Ten¬dencies of social media development in Georgia – power of real virtuality?! Tbilisi: Publishing House „Meridian”.
28.Webster, F. (2006). Theories of the Information Society. London–New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.