Skip to content
Acta Politica Polonica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

2/2019 (48)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
214
Publications
252
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.38
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 9 2018: 8 2019: 7 2020: 7 2021: 24 2022: 21 2023: 37 2024: 33 2025: 28 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017339
2018298
2019177
2020157
20211624
20222121
20231337
20242033
20251928
2026637

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Zjawisko europeizacji w kontekście polityki bezpieczeństwa cybernetycznego Unii Europejskiej


(The phenomenon of Europeanisation in the context of the cyber security policy of the European Union)
DOI: 10.18276/ap.2019.48-02
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2451-0432
Authors: Marek Górka
Politechnika Koszalińska, Wydział Humanistyczny

Martyna Gibka
Politechnika Koszalińska, Wydział Humanistyczny
Keywords: Europeanisation European integration globalisation cyber security policy digitisation cyber threats
Issue / book publication date:2019
Page range:14 (19-32)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ ERIH PLUS Diamond Discovery Hub
QR code

Abstract

EU security policy is undergoing a process of change that has not only affected its policies but also the emergence of new actors, which clearly shows that there is a significant evolution in relation to the EU policy dimension. Both specific events and long-term digital processes have revived and strengthened the EU discourse on the growing cyber threat. The aim of the article is to suggest that the cyber security perspective can clarify and enrich the process of Europeanisation with new aspects. In the context of the analysed topic, an attempt is made to describe the concept of Europeanisation and its application in the area of cyber security policy.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (48)
  1. Balzacq, T. (2008). The policy tools of securitization: information exchange, EU foreign and interior policies. Journal
  2. of Common Market Studies, 46 (1), 75–100.
  3. Börzel, T. (2003). Shaping and Taking EU Policies: Member State Responses to Europeanization (No. p0035). Pobrane
  4. z: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ erp/queens/p0035.html (18.09.2019).
  5. Börzel, T.A. (2005). Europeanization: How the European Union Interacts with Its Member States. W: S. Bulmer, Ch. Lequesne (red.), The Member States of the European Union (s. 45–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Börzel, T., Risse, T. (2018). From the Euro crisis to the Schengen crisis: European integration theories, politicization
  7. and identity politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (1), 83–108.
  8. Börzel, T.A., Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact. W: K. Featherstone, C. Radaelli (red.), The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Börzel, T.A., Risse, T. (2012). From Europeanisation to diffusion. West European Politics, 35(1), 1–19.
  10. Carrapico, H. (2014). Analysing the European Union’s responses to organised crime through different securitisation
  11. lenses. European Security, 23 (4), 601–617.
  12. Carrapico, H., Barrinha, A. (2017). The EU as Coherent (Cyber) Security Actor? Journal of Common Market Studies,
  13. 6 (55), 1–19.
  14. Costa, O. (2019). The politicisation of EU external relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (5), 790–802.
  15. De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., Schmidtke, H. (2016). Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance.
  16. West European Politics, 39 (1), 3–22.
  17. Dupont, C., Sciarini, P., Lutterbeck, D. (1999). Catching the EC Train: Austria and Switzerland in Comparative Perspec-
  18. tive. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (2), 191–224.
  19. ENISA (2013). Wytyczne techniczne dotyczące zgłaszania incydentów. Pobrane z: https://resilience.enisa.europa.eu/
  20. article-13/guideline-for-incident-reporting/technical-guideline-on-incident-reporting-v-2-0 (22.09.2019).
  21. ENISA (2016). Sprawozdanie na temat krajobrazu zagrożeń w 2016 r. Pobrane z: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publi- cations/enisa-threat-landscape-report-2016 (24.08.2019).
  22. Europol (2014). Europejskie Centrum ds. Cyberprzestępczości (EC3) – Sprawozdanie za pierwszy rok. Pobrane z:
  23. https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/european-cybercrime-center-ec3-firstyear-report (20.09.2019).
  24. Grande, E., Hutter, S. (2016). Introduction: European integration and the challenge of politicisation. W: S. Hutter, E. Grande, H. Kriesi (red.), Politicising Europe: integration and mass politics (s. 3–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J. (red.) (2001) Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca,
  26. NY: Cornell University Press.
  27. Hegemann, H. (2018). Toward „normal” politics? Security, parliaments and the politicization of intelligence oversight
  28. in the German Bundestag. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20 (1), 175–190.
  29. Jacoby, W. (2001). Tutors and Pupils: International Organizations, Central European Elites, and Western Models.
  30. Governance, 14 (2), 169–200.
  31. Juncker, J.C. (2016). Juncker after Brussels terror attack: „we feel we need a security union”. Pobrane z: https:// www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/video/junckerafter-brussels-terror-attacks-we-need-a-security- union/ (26.08.2019).
  32. Jupille, J. Caporaso, J. (2009). Domesticating discourses: European law, English judges and political institutions. Eu- ropean Political Science Review, 1 (2), 205–228.
  33. Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanization of National Administrations. Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence.
  34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Komisja Europejska (2005). Opinia Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego w sprawie komunikatu Komisji do Rady, Parlamentu Europejskiego, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego oraz Komitetu Regio- nów i2010 — Europejskie społeczeństwo informacyjne na rzecz wzrostu i zatrudnienia COM (2005) 229 końco- wy. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52006AE0415 (22.09.2019).
  36. Komisja Europejska (2006a). Strategia na rzecz bezpiecznego społeczeństwa informacyjnego – „Dialog, partner- stwo i przejmowanie inicjatywy”. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELE- X:52006DC0251 (4.09.2019).
  37. Komisja Europejska (2006b). Strategia na rzecz bezpiecznego społeczeństwa informacyjnego — Dialog, partnerstwo i przejmowanie inicjatywy COM (2006) 251 wersja ostateczna. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-con- tent/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52007AE0211 (25.09.2019).
  38. Komisja Europejska (2009). W sprawie ochrony krytycznej infrastruktury informatycznej – „Ochrona Europy przed zakrojonymi na szeroką skalę atakami i zakłóceniami cybernetycznymi: zwiększenie gotowości, bezpieczeń- stwa i odporności”. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52009D- C0149&from=en (18.09.2019).
  39. Komisja Europejska (2010). A Digital Agenda for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Parlia- ment, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52010DC0245R%2801%29 (23.09.2019).
  40. Komisja Europejska (2012). Zwalczanie przestępczości w erze cyfrowej: ustanowienie Europejskiego Centrum ds.
  41. Walki z Cyberprzestępczością. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELE- X:52012DC0140&from=EN (27.09.2019).
  42. Komisja Europejska (2013). Strategia bezpieczeństwa cybernetycznego Unii Europejskiej: otwarta, bezpieczna i chro- niona cyberprzestrzeń. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013JC0001 (22.09.2019).
  43. Komisja Europejska (2015a). Europejska agenda bezpieczeństwa, COM(2015) 185 final. Pobrane z: https://ec.europa. eu/anti-trafficking/eu-policy/european-agenda-security_en (12.09.2017).
  44. Komisja Europejska (2015b). European Agenda on Security. Pobrane z: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/home- affairs/files/e-library/documents/basic-documents/docs/eu_agenda_on_ security_en.pdf (26.09.2019).
  45. Komisja Europejska (2016). Komisja podpisuje porozumienie z przemysłem w sprawie bezpieczeństwa cybernetycznego i wzmaga wysiłki na rzecz zwalczania zagrożeń cybernetycznych. Pobrane z: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-rele- ase_IP-16-2321_en.htm (04.09.2019).
  46. Komisja Europejska (2017a). Launching the European Defence Fund, Communication from the Commission to the Euro- pean Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52017DC0295 (22.09.2019).
  47. Komisja Europejska (2017b). W sprawie skoordynowanego reagowania na incydenty i kryzysy cybernetyczne na dużą skalę. Pobrane z: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/3/2017/PL/C-2017-6100-F1-PL-MAIN-PART-1. PDF (23.09.2019).
  48. Komisja Europejska (2017c). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ENISA, the “EU Cybersecurity Agency”, and Repealing Regulation (EU) 526/2013, and on Information and Commu- nication Technology Cybersecurity Certification (“Cybersecurity Act’’). Pobrane z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2017:477:FIN (12.10.2019).