Skip to content

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media
nr 1 (16) 2021
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
130
Publications
323
H-index
5
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 3 2018: 0 2019: 4 2020: 9 2021: 17 2022: 17 2023: 27 2024: 16 2025: 23 2026: 13 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017323
2018260
2019304
2020319
20213017
20222517
20233427
20242716
20252923
2026013

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Od utrwalania do interakcji. Ewoluowanie praktyk autobiograficznych w internecie


(Form Preservation to Interaction. Evolution of Autobiographical Practices on the Internet)
DOI: 10.18276/au.2021.1.16-11
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This article analyses one of the many directions of change in online autobiographical practices, i.e. the decrease in the importance of autobiographical content preservation and archiving with the simultaneous increased popularity of ephemeral contents, e.g. that which is automatically deleted after a single display (self-destructive messages). This trend in autobiographical digital practices is illustrated with significant examples of new media formats such as homepages, blogs as well as entries on the social media platform Facebook and the application Snapchat. The article enumerates stages of change with reference to various communication tools, but it should be noted that the evolutionary process is continuous, and its stages overlap. The indicated direction of change in online autobiographical practices, determined by developmental realities of new media, is analysed in connection with processual media theory, as well as the concept of an ephemeral turn in a digital environment.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (22)
  1. Carroll, Traci. „Want Ads: Reading the Personals”. W: Getting a Life: Everyday Uses of Autobiogra¬phy, red. Sidonie Smith, Julia Watson, 156–173. Minneapolis–London: University of Minne¬sota Press, 1996.
  2. Chandler, Daniel, Dilwyn Roberts-Young. The Construction of Identity in the Personal Homepa¬ges of Adolescents. Dostęp 25.01.2021. http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/ strasbourg.html.
  3. Cheung, Chi Wai. „A Home on the Web: Presentations of Self on Personal Homepages”. W: Web Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, red. David Gauntlett, 43–51. London: Arnold, 2000.
  4. Doctorow, Cory, Rael Dornfest, J. Scott Johnson, Shelley Powers, Benjamin Trott, Mena G. Trott. Essential Blogging: Selecting and Using Weblog Tools. Beijing: O’Reilly, 2002.
  5. Elwood, Sarah, Katharyne Mitchell. „Technology, Memory, and Collective Knowing”. Cultural Geographies 22 (2015), 1: 147–154.
  6. Haber, Benjamin. „The Digital Ephemeral Turn: Queer Theory, Privacy, and the Temporality of Risk”. Media, Culture & Society 41 (2019), 8: 1069–1087.
  7. Hijmans, Ellen, Martine van Selm. „Between Altruism and Narcissism: an Action Theoretical Approach of Personal Homepages Devoted to Existential Meaning”. Communications 27 (2002), 1: 103–125.
  8. Ignacio, Siles. „The Rise of Blogging: Articulation as a Dynamic of Technological Stabilization”. New Media & Society 14 (2011), 5: 781–797.
  9. Köhl, Margarita Marie, Gerit Götzenbrucker. „Networked Technologies as Emotional Resources? Exploring Emerging Emotional Cultures on Social Network Sites Such as Facebook and Hi5: a Trans-Cultural Study”. Media, Culture & Society 36 (2014), 4: 508–525.
  10. Lash, Scott. Critique of Information. London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi: SAGE, 2002.
  11. Michelson, Elana. „Autobiography and Selfhood in the Practice of Adult Learning”. Adult Educa¬tion Quarterly 61 (2010), 1: 3–21.
  12. Miller, Nod, David Morgan. „Called to Account: The CV as an Autobiographical Practice”. Socio¬logy 27 (1993), 1: 133–143.
  13. O’Reilly, Tim. What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Dostęp 25.01.2021. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20. html.
  14. Perreault, Jeanne, Marlene Kadar. „Introduction: Tracing the Autobiographical: Unlikely Docu¬ments, Unexpected Places. W: Tracing the Autobiographical, red. Marlene Kadar, Linda War¬ley, Jeanne Perreault, Susanna Egan, 1–8. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2005.
  15. Rodríguez, Karlie. „SnapCHAT: The Genre of the Vanishing Memoir”. Grassroots Writing Rese¬arch Journal 7 (2016): 55–63. Dostęp 25.01.2021. http://isuwriting.com/wp-content/uplo¬ads/2016/07/Rodri%CC%81guez-Karlie-GWRJ7.1.pdf.
  16. Rossiter, Ned. „Processual Media Theory”. Symplokē 11 (2003), 1–2: 104–131.
  17. Sandberg, Marianne. Themes in Personal Homepages. A Systemic Functional Approach to Analyzing Texts in Personal Homepages by Ph.D. Students. Dostęp 21.01.2021. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/ articles/closed/2003/005/sandberg2003005-paper.html.
  18. Walker, Jill. „Blog (Weblog)”. W: Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, red. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, Marie-Laure Ryan, 45. London–New York: Routledge, 2005.
  19. Wallace, Patricia. The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  20. Wang, Lingzhen. Personal Matters: Women’s Autobiographical Practice in Twentieth-Century China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
  21. Warschauer, Mark, Douglas Grimes. „Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27 (2007): 1–23.
  22. Wynn, Eleanor, James E. Katz. „Hyperbole Over Cyberspace: Self-Presentation and Social Boun¬daries in Internet Home Pages and Discourse”. The Information Society 13 (1997), 4: 297–327.