Skip to content

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media
nr 1 (18) 2022
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
130
Publications
321
H-index
5
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 0 2019: 4 2020: 6 2021: 17 2022: 16 2023: 23 2024: 16 2025: 29 2026: 16 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017312
2018260
2019304
2020316
20213017
20222516
20233423
20242716
20252929
2026016

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Autopatografia jako przestrzeń „spotkania troski”. O realizacji postulatów medycyny narracyjnej w Mięchu Anety Żukowskiej


(Clinical Encounters as “Encounters of Care”. Bringing Ideals of Narrative Medicine into Life in Aneta Żukowska’s Mięcho)
DOI: 10.18276/au.2022.1.18-13
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This article presents autopathography as a genre in which patients can reclaim their voices to articulate their experiences of the medical system, drawing on Arthur Frank’s theory in The Wounded Storyteller. Illness narratives can be understood not only as means of expressing a largely negative experience by way of monologue, but also as platforms for dialogue between patients and their caregivers. Such encounters, albeit seemingly impossible under the conditions of contemporary medical system, have been postulated, among others, by Rita Charon, the founder of narrative medicine. In the text, autobiographical works of Anatole Broyard and Aneta Żukowska are given as examples of patients expressing the need for a sustained, mutual relationship between doctors and their patients. As such, autopathographies can play their part in bringing to life the ideals of narrative medicine, as well as of what S. L. Jain called “elegiaic politics”.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Aronson, Jeffrey K. „Autopathography. The Patient’s Tale”. British Medical Journal 321 (2000): 1599–1602.
  2. Boruszkowska, Iwona. Defekty. Literackie Auto/pato/grafie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2016.
  3. Broyard, Anatole. Upojony chorobą. Zapiski o życiu i śmierci. Tłum. Agnieszka Nowakowska, Woło¬wiec: Czarne, 2010.
  4. Charon, Rita, DasGupta, Santayani, Hermann, Nellie, Irvine, Craig, Marcus, Eric R., Rivera Colón, Edgar, Spencer, Danielle, Spiegel, Maura. Medycyna narracyjna. Teoria i praktyka. Tłum. Maria Świątkowska. Kraków: Medycyna Praktyczna, 2020.
  5. Czapliński, Przemysław. „Opiekuńcza utopia”. Teksty Drugie 1 (2021): 7–18.
  6. Dauksza, Agnieszka. „Humanistyka medyczna. O leczeniu (się) w patosystemie”. Teksty Drugie 1 (2021): 38–58.
  7. Frank, Arthur. The Wounded Storyteller. Body, Illness and Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  8. Jain, Sarah L. „Living in Prognosis. Toward an Elegiac Politics”. Representations 98 (2007): 77–92.
  9. Ładoń, Monika. Choroba jako literatura. Studia Maladyczne. Katowice: Stowarzyszenie Inicjatyw Wydawniczych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Śląsk”, 2019.
  10. Sławek, Tadeusz. „Ja bolę”. W: Fragmenty dyskursu maladycznego, red. Maciej Ganczar, Ireneusz Gielata, Monika Ładoń, 89–107. Gdańsk: Fundacja Terytoria Książki, 2019.
  11. Szubert, Mateusz. „Dyskurs maladyczny. Perspektywy badawcze”. W: Fragmenty dyskursu mala¬dycznego, red. Maciej Ganczar, Ireneusz Gielata, Monika Ładoń, 17–35. Gdańsk: Fundacja Terytoria Książki, 2019.
  12. Żukowska, Aneta. Mięcho. Kraków: Karakter, 2019.