Skip to content
Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia

1/2016 (79)
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
2
References
30
Citations by year
YearCitations
20192

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.15219/em78.1403 (2019)
View source (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Segregacja i spójność w sieci powiązań rad dyrektorów (interlocking directorates)


(The Segregation and Cohesion in the Network of Interlocking Directorates)
DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2016.79-49
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2450-7741
eISSN:2300-4460
Authors: Dariusz Siudak
Keywords: interlocking directorates segregation cohesion resource-dependence theory
Issue / book publication date:2016
Page range:11 (617-627)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Enable JavaScript to retrieve citation data.
CC BY-SA Open Access
QR code

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of the paper is an assessment of segregation and cohesion degree in the company network on the Polish capital market through the analysis of interlocking directorates of publicly listed companies. Design/methodology/approach – The social network analysis and statistical analysis were applied. Results – The companies grouped by their the economic industries are characterized by their lack of cohesion and segregation. The relations established between the companies are in most cases cross-sector links, which express a given company’s desire to limit its uncertainty in its environment. It may be explained by the resources dependence theory. Originality/value – This is a first attempt to analyze the aforementioned issues on the Polish capital market

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (57)
  1. Alba R.D. (1973), A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique, „Journal of Mathematical Sociology” vol. 3,
  2. s. 113–126.
  3. Bock R.D., Husain S.Z. (1950), An adaptation of Holzinger’s B-coefficients for the analysis of sociometric data,
  4. „Sociometry” vol. 13, s. 146–153.
  5. Bojanowski M., Corten R. (2014), Measuring segregation in social networks, „Social Networks” vol. 39, s. 14–32.
  6. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Johnson J.C. (2013), Analyzing Social Networks, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
  7. Boyd B. (1990), Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model,
  8. „Strategic Management Journal” vol. 11, s. 419–430.
  9. Caldarelli G., Catanzaro M. (2004), The corporate boards networks, „Physica A”, vol. 338, s. 98–106.
  10. Campigotto R., Guillamue J.L. (2014), The Power of Consensus: Random Graphs Still Have No Communities,
  11. w: Social Network Analysis – Community Detection and Evolution, red. R. Missaoui, I. Sarr, Springer, s. 145–
  12. 164.
  13. Catanzaro M., Caldarelli G., Pietronero L. (2004), Assortative model for social networks, „Physical Review E”,
  14. vol. 70, s. 037101–037104.
  15. Chin-Huat O., Wan D., Kee-Sing O. (2003), An Exploratory Study on Interlocking Directorates in Listed Firms in
  16. Singapore, „Corporate Governance: An International Review” vol. 11, s. 322–334.
  17. Dorogovtsev S. (2010), Lectures on Complex Networks, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  18. Henning M., Brandes U., Pfeffer J., Mergel I. (2012), Studying Social Networks. A Guide to Empirical Reaserch,
  19. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt–New York.
  20. Krackhardt D., Stern R.N. (1988), Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation,
  21. „Social Psychology Quarterly” vol. 51, no. 2, s. 123–140.
  22. Newman M. (2002), Assortative mixing in networks, „Physical Review Letters” vol. 89.
  23. Newman M. (2004), Fast Algorithm for Detecting Community Structure in Networks, „Physical Review E” vol. 69.
  24. Newman M. (2006a), Modularity and Community Structure in Networks, „Proceedings of the National Academy
  25. of Sciences” vol. 103, no. 23.
  26. Newman M. (2006b), Finding Community Structure in Networks Using the Eigenvectors of Matrices, Physical
  27. Review E, 74 (3).
  28. Newman M. (2010), Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  29. Newman M., Girvan M. (2004), Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks, „Physical Review E”
  30. vol. 69.
  31. Pearce J.A., Zahra S.A. (1992), Board composition form strategic contingency perspective, „Journal of Management
  32. Studies” vol. 29, s. 411–438.
  33. Pennings J.M. (1980), Interlocking directorates, Jossey-Bass Limited, San Francisco.
  34. Pfeffer J. (1987), A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations, w: Intercorporate Relations:
  35. The Structural Analysis of Business, red. M.S. Mizruchi, M. Schwartz, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  36. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (2003/1978), The external control of organizations: A resources dependence perspective,
  37. Standford University Press, Standford.
  38. Phan P., Lee S.H., Lau S.C. (2003), The Performance Impact of Interlocking Directorates: The Case of Singapore,
  39. „Journal of Management Issues” vol. XV, no. 3, s. 338–352.
  40. Sankowska A., Siudak D. (2015), Empiryczna weryfikacja teorii uzależnienia zasobowego w kontekście usieciowienia
  41. rady dyrektorów (interlocking directorates), Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego nr 855,
  42. „Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia” nr 74, t. 1, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego,
  43. Szczecin, s. 661–673.
  44. Sankowska A., Siudak D. (2016), The Small World Phenomenon and Assortative Mixing in Polish Corporate Board
  45. and Director Networks, „Physica A” vol. 443, s. 309–315.
  46. Siudak D. (2015), Struktura społeczności sieci powiązań rad dyrektorów przedsiębiorstw na polskim rynku kapitałowym,
  47. „Przegląd Statystyczny” t. 62/2, s. 183–197.
  48. Stiles P., Taylor B. (2010), Boards at Work. How Directors View Their Roles and Responsibilities, Oxford University
  49. Press, Oxford.
  50. Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994), Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  51. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. (1998), Collective dynamics of `small-world’ networks, „Nature” vol. 393, s. 440–442.
  52. Yang Y., Cai N. (2011), Interlocking directorates and firm’s diversification strategy: perspective of strategy learning,
  53. w: Innovative computing and information, red. M. Dali, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, s. 87–94.
  54. Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A. (1989), Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative
  55. Model, „Journal of Management” vol. 15, s. 291–334.
  56. Zdziarski M. (2012), Relacje w radach nadzorczych spółek publicznych, „Współczesne Zarządzanie” nr 4, s. 223–
  57. 231.