Skip to content

Nowa Krytyka

Nowa Krytyka

czasopismo filozoficzne

Previously: Nowa Krytyka : czasopismo filozoficzne

35 rok 2015
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Semantic Scholar

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
2
Citations highlighted by Semantic Scholar
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Ruchliwość społeczna wielkoprzemysłowej klasy robotniczej – przykład trójmiejskich stoczniowców


(Social Mobility of Industrial Working Class. An Example of Shipyard Workers from Gdansk and Gdynia)
DOI: 10.18276/nk.2015.35-08
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a pilot survey conducted among the shipyard workers from Gdansk and Gdynia. The objective of the study was to diagnose the social mobility of those workers. We focused on the mechanisms behind the position change for both the workers and their adult children. Intragenerational mobility was captured by an examination of two moments of shipbuilders professional biographies. The first involved the late 70’s and early 80’s, the second refered to the current class position. At the same time, the contemporary class position of the adult children of the shipyard workers was studied, which allowed us to examine intergenerational mobility as well. Three research questions were answered using the empirical evidence: − Has the class position of shipyard workers changed? In other words; whether they have gone from working class to another great social class (eg. petty bourgeoisie, capitalist class, service class, etc.).− Has the specific intraclass position of workers changed?− Does the class position of children differ from the position of the parents? The terminology used above clearly indicates our interest in class positions. Class can be called a collection of people involved identical positions in the social division of labor and ownership or how Jacek Tittenbrun puts it: “groups of people which differ from each other by the place they occupy in a historically determined system of economic activity (i.e. production, exchange, transport, finance and services)” (Tittenbrun 2011, 188–189).As noted above, in the first part of the study we describe shipbuilders’ class position in the early 80s and also their current position. Class position of the workers was finally compared to the current class position of their offspring. In this paper the preliminary results are presented. Particular attention is devoted to the changes in the stability of employment. We discuss how the working condition of the shipyard workers changed aswell as we compare the stability of employment of parents and children.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Dunn E. 2007. Prywatyzując Polskę. Tłum. Przemysław Sadura. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej
  2. Hardy J. 2010. Nowy polski kapitalizm. Tłum. Agata Czarnacka. Warszawa: Książka i Prasa
  3. Kozyr-Kowalski S. 2004. Socjologia, społeczeństwo obywatelskie i państwo. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM
  4. Kozyr-Kowalski S. 1967. Max Weber a Karol Marks. Socjologia Maxa Webera jako „pozytywna krytyka materializmu historycznego”. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza
  5. Ost D. 2007. Klęska solidarności, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Muza
  6. Tittenbrun J. 1992. Upadek socjalizmu realnego w Polsce, Poznań: Rebis
  7. Tittenbrun J. 2007. Z deszczu pod rynnę. Meandry polskiej prywatyzacji t. 1–4. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Znak
  8. Tittenbrun J. 2009. Małe jest piękne? Stosunki własności siły roboczej w sektorze MSP. Szczecin: MyBook
  9. Tittenbrun J. 2010. Struktura klasowo-stanowa społeczności Poznania, Poznań: Nakom
  10. Tittenbrun J. 2012. Gospodarka w społeczeństwie. Zarys socjologii gospodarki i socjologii ekonomicznej w ujęciu strukturalizmu socjo-ekonomicznego, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Znak
  11. Weber M. 2002. Gospodarka i społeczeństwo. Zarys socjologii rozumiejącej. Tłum. D. Lachowska. Warszawa: PWN