Pedagogika Szkoły Wyższej

ISSN: 2083-4381    OAI
CC BY-SA   Open Access 

Issue archive / 2/2013
Uniwersytet wobec zmiany kulturowej w Polsce

Authors: Jolanta Miluska
Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Keywords: university cultural change attitudes towards cultural change
Data publikacji całości:2013
Page range:13 (11-23)


The systemic transformation in Poland has political, economic, demographic, social as well as cultural and psychological character, which states the principles of functioning of individuals, social groups and institutions including universities. The cultural change analyzed in the context of acculturation process means the necessity of adaptation of relatively new culture values: equality, individualism, cultural masculinity and new openess in new situation. There are four possible attitudes towards this process: separation, marginalization, assimilation and integration, which are connected also with university as the institution and social environment. The analysis of these attitudes shows their aspects and consequences. In the situation of cultural change remembering the mission of the University is needed as it states possible, permissible and desirable changes.
Download file

Article file


1.Berry J. W., Acculturation and psychological adaptation: A conceptual overview, w: Ethnic psychology: Research and practice with immigrants, refugees, native peoples, ethnic groups and sojourners, red. J.W. Berry, R.C. Annis, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam– Lisse 1988.
2.Berry J. W., Immigration, acculturation and adaptation, „Applied Psychology: An International Review” 1997, nr 46.
3.Berry J., Acculturation as varieties of adaptation, w: Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings, red. A. Padilla, Westview, Boulder, Co 1980.
4.Berry J.W., Poortinga Y. H., Segall M. H., Dasen P.R., Cross-cultural psychology. Research and applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
5.Chinese Culture Connection, Chinese values and the search for culture – free dimensions of culture, „Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology” 1987, nr 18.
6.Hofstede G., Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills 1980.
7.Hofstede G., Kultury i organizacje, przeł. M. Durska, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2000.
8.Inkeles A., Levinson D. J., National character: The study of modal personality and sociocultural systems, w: The Handbook of Social Psychology, red. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson, McGraw-Hill, New York 1969.
9.Posern-Zieliński A., Akulturacja, w: Słownik etnologiczny. Terminy ogólne, red. Z. Staszczak, PWN, Warszawa–Poznań 1987.
10.Redfield R., Linton R., Herskovitz M. J., Memorandum on the study of acculturation, „American Anthropologist” 1936, nr 38.
11.Reykowski J., Ukryte założenia normatywne jako osiowy składnik mentalności, w: Orientacje społeczne jako element mentalności, red. J. Reykowski, K. Skarżyńska, M. Ziółkowski, Wydawnictwo Nakom, Poznań 1990.
12.Schwartz S. H., Individualism – collectivism. Critique and proposed refinements, „Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology” 1990, nr 21.
13.Schwartz S. H., Universals in the content and structure of value. Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, w: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, red. M. Zanna, Academic Press, New York 1992.
14.Tyszka Z., System metodologiczny wieloaspektowej integralnej analizy życia rodzinnego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2001.
15.Weber M., Etyka protestancka a duch kapitalizmu, przeł. T. Miziński, Wydawnictwo Test, Lublin 1994. (23.10.2013).ły/05.html (23.10.2013).