Skip to content

Rocznik Komparatystyczny

Rocznik Komparatystyczny
11 (2020)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
181
Publications
250
H-index
5
I10-index
3
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.12
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 4 2019: 25 2020: 43 2021: 18 2022: 12 2023: 13 2024: 20 2025: 15 2026: 16 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017202
201804
20191725
20203243
20211418
20221612
20231613
20241320
20251315
2026016

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Film Noir: (Re)Constructing the Definition

DOI: 10.18276/rk.2020.11-14
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

Throughout the last 80 years, scholars and film critics have tried to define film noir and come up with various theories. Some claim film noir is a genre, others classify it as a style. The definition of the phenomenon appears to be rather elusive. In consequence, some films are classified as noir or neo-noir even though they seem not to meet the necessary requirements to be categorized as such. The following article examines the most popular theories on film noir and explains why it is impossible to construct one and final definition.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (21)
  1. Borde, Raymond, Étienne Chaumeton. “Towards a Definition of Film Noir.” Film Noir Reader. Eds. Alain Silver, James Ursini. Limelight Editions, 1996. 17–25.
  2. Breu, Christopher, Elizabeth A. Hatmaker. “Introduction: Dark Passages.” Noir Affect. Eds. Christopher Breu, Elizabeth A. Hatmaker. New York: Fordham University Press, 2020. 1–28.
  3. Christopher, Nicholas. Somewhere in the Night. Film Noir and the American City. Berkeley: Shoemaker & Hoard, 2006.
  4. Conard, Mark T. “Nietzsche and the Meaning and Definition of Noir.” The Philosophy of Film Noir. Ed. Mark T. Conrad. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2006. 7–22.
  5. Damico, James. “Film Noir: A Modest Proposal.” Film Noir Reader. Eds. Alain Silver, James Ursini. Limelight Editions, 1996. 95–106.
  6. Fay, Jennifer, Justus Nieland. Film Noir: Hard-Boiled Modernity and the Cultures of Globalization. Routledge, 2010.
  7. Gustafsson, Henrik. “A Wet Emptiness: The Phenomenology of Film Noir.” A Companion to Film Noir. Eds. Andrew Spicer, Helen Hanson. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2013. 50–66.
  8. Handel, Leo A. Hollywood Looks at Its Audience. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1950.
  9. Hirsch, Foster. The Dark Side of the Screen: Film Noir. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 1981.
  10. Kerr, Paul. “Out of What Past? The ‘B’ Film Noir.” Screen Education 32.3 (1979).
  11. Krutnik, Frank. In a Lonely Street: Film Noir, Genre, Masculinity. Routledge, 2001.
  12. Naremore, James. More than Night: Film Noir in Its Contexts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.
  13. Palmer, Barton R. Hollywood’s Dark Cinema: The American Film Noir. Boston: Twayne, 1994.
  14. Park, William. What Is Noir? Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 2011.
  15. Phillips, Gene D. Out of the Shadows: Expanding the Canon of Classic Film Noir. The Scarecrow Press, 2012.
  16. Porfirio, Robert G., Alain Silvesti, James Ursini. Film Noir Reader 3. Limelight Editions, 2002.
  17. Schatz, Thomas. Hollywood Genres. Formulas, Filmmaking and the Studio System. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
  18. Schrader, Paul. “Notes on Film Noir.” Film Comment 8.1 (1972): 8–13.
  19. Selby, Spencer. Dark City: The Film Noir. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1984.
  20. Spicer, Andrew. Film Noir. Routledge, 2002.
  21. Staiger, Janet. “Hybrid or Inbred: The Purity Hypothesis and Hollywood Genre History.” Film Genre Reader III. Ed. Barry Keith Grant. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003. 185–199.