Skip to content
Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie
nr 27 2020
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
156
Publications
373
H-index
4
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.08
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 9 2018: 7 2019: 10 2020: 9 2021: 15 2022: 12 2023: 27 2024: 20 2025: 17 2026: 5 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017239
2018227
20192210
2020389
20212915
20221812
20231527
20242120
20251817
2026145

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Transhumanistyczne wyzwania przyszłości. Wychowanie i edukacja


(Transhumanistic challenges of the future. Upbringing and education)
DOI: 10.18276/skk.2020.27-22
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:1230-0780
eISSN:2719-4337
Authors: Krzysztof Łuszczek ORCID
Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Keywords: pedagogy transhumanism technology education
Issue / book publication date:2020
Page range:14 (391-404)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
CC BY-SA Open Access DOAJ CEEOL ERIH PLUS Diamond Discovery Hub
QR code

Abstract

Anthropology based on transhumanistic ideas comes to the fore more strongly in everyday life practice. This is facilitated by technological development and binding of newly emerging devices into a network. The number of devices operating in the network is increasing and there are more of them than the human population. This has an impact on the young generation which no longer knows the world other than that filled with smartphones, computers, robots and technology enabling fast communication. This affects both upbringing and education. In the case of upbringing, the excess of devices in the educational environment adversely affects the quality of interpersonal communication and the acquisition of communication competences. In turn, education under the strong pressure of technology often eliminates the values characteristic of traditional education, such as shaping the master–student relationship, or leads to the marginalisation of human sciences. Parents and educators must consider technology as a factor that seriously shapes the development of young people’s relationships and the way it shapes educational activity.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (42)
  1. Asimow, Isaac. Ja robot. Tłum. Zbigniew Królicki. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, 2013.
  2. Assange, Julian, Jacob Appelbaum, Andy Muller-Maguhn, Jeremie Zimmermann. Cypherpunks. Wolność i przyszłość internetu. Tłum. Marcin Machnik. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion, 2013.
  3. Beynon, John. „Technological Literacy: Where Do We Go From Here?”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 2 (1993): 7–35.
  4. Bostrom, Nick. „A History of Transhumanist Thought”. Journal of Evolution and Technology 14 (2005). Dostęp 10.09.2019. https://jetpress.org/volume14/bostrom.html.
  5. Bostrom, Nick. „Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective”. The Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (2003): 493–506.
  6. Butnick, Stephanie. „Shulamith Firestone, a Leading Thinker of Second-Wave Feminism Has Died”. Tablet Magazine, 30.08.2012. Dostęp 15.09.2019. https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/110721/shulamith-firestone-1945–2012.
  7. Collins, Allan, Richard Halverson. Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology. The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 2009.
  8. Collins, Allan. What’s Worth Teaching? Rethinking Curriculum in the Age of Technology. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 2017.
  9. Collis, Betty. „A Reflection on the Relationship Between Technology and Teacher education: Synergy or Separate Entities?”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 3 (1994): 7–25.
  10. Collis, Betty. „Information Technology and Teacher Education: Focus on Student Learning or on Teacher Change?”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 2 (1993): 115–126.
  11. Firestone, Shulamith. The Dialectic of Sex: A Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1970.
  12. „Franciszek w Japonii – podsumowanie dnia trzeciego”. eKAI, 25.11.2019. Dostęp 25.11.2019. https://ekai.pl/franciszek-w-japonii-podsumowanie-dnia-trzeciego.
  13. Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.
  14. Hughes, James, Democratic Transhumanism 2.0. Dostęp 13.09.2019. http://changesurfer.com/Acad/DemocraticTranshumanism.htm.
  15. Hughes, James. Citizen Cyborg. Why Democracies Must Respond to the Redesigning of Human Nature. New York: Basic Books, 2004.
  16. Kellner, Douglas. „Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogy in a Multicultural Society”. Educational Theory 48 (1998): 103–122.
  17. Kurzweil, Raymond. The Age of Intelligent Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
  18. Kurzweil, Raymond. The Age of Spiritual Machine. New York: Viking Press, 1999.
  19. Kurzweil, Raymond. The Singularity is Near. New York: Viking Press, 2005.
  20. Lasch, Chritopher. The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal if Democracy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1996.
  21. Łuszczek, Krzysztof. „Pedagogical Aspects of Robot Anthropomorphism in the Light of the Critical Historical Theory”. Studia i Prace WNEIZ US 54 (2018): 37–50.
  22. Malucha, Marek. „Internet rzeczy – kontekst technologiczny i obszary zastosowań”. Studia i Prace WNEIZ US 54 (2018): 51–70.
  23. Martin, Douglas. „Futurist Known as FM – 2030 Is Dead at 69”. The New York Times, 11.06.2000. Dostęp 13.09.2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2000/07/11/us/futurist-known¬-as-fm-2030-is-dead-at-69.html.
  24. Mazurek, Sławomir. Rosyjski renesans religijno-filozoficzny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, 2008.
  25. McLuhan Marshall. Wybór pism. Tłum. Karol Jakubowicz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Artystyczne i Filmowe, 1975.
  26. McLuhan, Marshall. Zrozumieć media. Przedłużenia człowieka. Tłum. Natalia Szczucka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, 2004.
  27. Miller, Daniel, Don Slater, Lucy Suchman. „Anthropology”. W: Academy and the Internet, red. Helen Nissenbaum, Mouroe Price, 71–89. New York–Washington D.C./Baltimore–Bern–Frankfurt am Main–Berlin–Brussels–Vienna–Oxford: Peter Lang, 2004.
  28. Minsky, Marvin. The Emotion Machine. New York: Simon&Schuster, 2006.
  29. Moravec, Hans. „Rise of the Robots – The Future of Artificial Intelligence”. Scientific American, 23.03.2009. Dostęp 11.09.2019. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rise-of-the-robots.
  30. Nie, Norman H., Sunshine D. Hillygus, Lutz Erbring. „Internet Use Interpersonal Relations and Sociability: A Time Diary Study”. W: The Internet in Everyday Life, red. Barry Wellman, Caroline Haythornthwaite, 213–243. Oxford: Blackwell 2002.
  31. Picard, Rosalind. Affective Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
  32. Postman, Neil. Technopol. Triumf techniki nad kulturą. Tłum. Anna Tanalska-Dulęba. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA SA, 2004.
  33. Prensky, Marc. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, 2012.
  34. „Robert Ettinger”. The Thelegraph, 24.07.2011. Dostęp 10.09.2019. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/science-obituaries/8658435/Robert-Ettinger.html.
  35. Ryan, Marie-Laure. Narrative as Virtual reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
  36. Selwyn, Neil. Distrusting Educational Technology. Critical Questions for Changing Times. New York: Routledge, 2013.
  37. Selwyn, Neil. Education and Technology. Key Issues and Debates. London–Oxford–New York–New Delhi–Sydney: Bloomsbury, 2017.
  38. Selwyn, Neil. Is Technology Good for Education?. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
  39. Turkle, Sherry. Samotni razem. Dlaczego oczekujemy więcej od zdobyczy techniki, a mniej od siebie nawzajem. Tłum. Małgorzata Cierpisz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2013.
  40. Tweddle, Sally, „The Future Curriculum and Information Technology”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 2 (1993): 105–110.
  41. Williams, Raymond. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  42. Wright, Peter. „Teaching Teachers About Computers”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 2 (1993): 37–52.