Skip to content
Acta Politica Polonica

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

1/2025 (59)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
191
Publications
264
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.29
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 9 2018: 8 2019: 8 2020: 5 2021: 26 2022: 21 2023: 36 2024: 29 2025: 22 2026: 24 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017369
2018298
2019178
2020155
20211626
20222121
20231336
20242029
20251922
2026624

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Scena polityczna Królestwa Rumunii w okresie międzywojennym


(Political landscape in Kingdom of Romania during interwar period)
DOI: 10.18276/ap.2025.59-04
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the Romanian political landscape during the interwar period and identify the causes of the parliamentary system’s collapse, followed by the monarchical system’s downfall, ultimately leading to the fascist dictatorship of Ion Antonescu and the Iron Guard. To achieve this, the following thesis was formulated: the instability of the political structure in the Kingdom of Romania was caused by the multi-faceted nature of the political scene, reflected in the monarch’s intervention in the political process and the activities of far-right organizations. To confirm this thesis, the following research questions were posed: How did the First World War affect the political situation in the country? What factors contributed to the instability of the political situation during the period of parliamentarism? What led to the downfall of Charles II’s rule? To achieve the above goal and answer the research questions, methods appropriate for historical sciences and techniques – source analysis and case study – were employed. The result of this analysis is that the cause of the instability of successive governments in the Kingdom of Romania during the interwar period was largely the lack of adequate legal mechanisms, the conflict between the monarch seeking to assume authoritarian power and the far-right Iron Guard, which sought a similar goal. Additionally, the main factors contributing to the fall of successive Romanian regimes are considered to be the political incompetence of the monarch, the unfavorable international situation, and a lack of political culture.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (16)
  1. Blasen P.H. (2024). Fairy-tale prince or voivode? Royalist propaganda and theories of monarchy under Carol II of Romania. History of European Ideas, 1–23. Pobrane z: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01916599.2024.2332840 (4.08.2024). DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2024.2332840
  2. Buzatu M. (2012). The Romanian Monarchy And The Nationalist Propaganda. Case Study: King Carol II’s Visits To The Historical Regions Of Romania – Transilvania, Dobrogea And Basarabia (December 1939 – January 1940). Interstitio. East European Review of Historical and Cultural Anthropology, 1–2, 144–150.
  3. Davidescu C. (2002). Totalitarian Discourse as Rejection of Modernity: The Iron Guard, A Case-Study. W: M. Czobor- -Lupp, J. Stefan Lupp (red.), Moral, Legal and Political Values in Romanian Culture. Waszyngton: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
  4. Dubicki A. (2013). System partyjny Królestwa Rumunii. Uwarunkowania i funkcjonowanie. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  5. Gligor M. (2008). The Ideology of the Archangel Michael Legion and Mircea Eliade’s Political Views in Interwar Romania. International Journal on Humanistic Ideology, 1, 111–126.
  6. Grecu F. (2023). The Nation’s Party Under The Dictatorship of King Carol II. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 22 (66), 112–125.
  7. Kessler E. (2007), Ideas And Ideology In Interwar Romania. Pobrane z: https://www.icr.ro/pagini/ideas-and-ideology- -in-interwar-romania (4.11.2024).
  8. Horga I., Stoica A. (2012). Totalitarianism in Europe. Case study: Romania between left-wing and right-wing dictatorships (1938–1989) W: G. Laschi (red.), Memoria d’ Europa. Riflessioni su dittature, autoritarismo, bonapartismo e svolte democratiche. Mediolan: FrancoAngeli Press.
  9. Ilie M. (2015). The Party of The Nation – king Carol II’s last attempt to monopolize the Romanian political life. Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XX, 1 (27) 109–113.
  10. Ilie M. (2015). Processing the Political Image of a King: An Overview of the Interwar and Communist Discourse about Carol II of Romania. Journal of Political Sciences, 47, 206–215.
  11. Ilie M. (2018). The Game Of Power: King Carol II and The Political Parties at The End Of The Year 1937. Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXIII, 1 (33), 77–86.
  12. Ilie M. (2019). The ideology of the National Renaissance Front in pro-carlist contemporary perceptions. Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Istorie, Anul XXIV, 2 (36), 79–89.
  13. Kenyon P. (2023). Dzieci nocy. Nadzwyczajna historia współczesnej Rumunii. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  14. Meale J. (2016). The Romanian Iron Guard: Fascist Sacralized Politics or Fascist Politicized Religion? Occasional Papers On Religion In Eastern Europe, 5 (XXXVI), 61–74.
  15. Niculescu T. (2019). Mistyk z rewolwerem. Corneliu Zela Codrenau. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
  16. Radu S. (2018). Romania and the Great War: Political, Territorial, Economic and Social Consequences. Pamięć i Sprawiedliwość, 1 (31), 138–166.