Skip to content
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Acta Politica

Currently: Acta Politica Polonica

1/2010 (23)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
214
Publications
252
H-index
5
I10-index
1
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.38
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 9 2018: 8 2019: 7 2020: 7 2021: 24 2022: 21 2023: 37 2024: 33 2025: 28 2026: 37 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017339
2018298
2019177
2020157
20211624
20222121
20231337
20242033
20251928
2026637

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Prawda czy tylko prawdopodobność – o roli debaty publicznej w kształtowaniu opinii i poglądów


(The possibility of real or is it just – the role of public debate in shaping opinions and views)
Cite

The full text is not available in this service

Abstract

Democracy as a form of organization of social and political life contains in itself a significant paradox. Despite the obvious fact that as individuals with limited opportunitiesand abilities, we cannot know all, we are obliged to have opinions and to decide (and co-decide) on everything. This commitment is usually expressed in a practicalmanner when making political decisions during elections, referenda, when participating in discussions or expressing opinions recorded by public opinion research centers,which consequently form the basis of legitimacy for politicians’ actions. In everyday conversation, we can very often come across the situation when our interlocutors agree or disagree on a particular matter, but are completely unable to justify their beliefs. However, it does not change the fact that on the basis on those beliefs, they take certain decisions. And the importance of votes cast by conscious and unconscious electorate is identical and has the same effect.

Bibliography

  1. Jonczek J., Kempisty M., Socjotechniki wyborcze – przypadek polskiej kampanii referendalnej w kwestii przystąpienia Polski do Unii Europejskiej, „Problemy Humanistyki” 2003/2004, nr 8/9.
  2. Lachowiecki L., Sztuka zwycięskiej dyskusji, Warszawa 1997.
  3. Lemmermann H., Szkoła dyskutowania. Techniki argumentacji, dyskusje, dialogi, Wrocław 1996.
  4. Tokarz M., Argumentacja, Perswazja, Manipulacja. Wykłady z teorii komunikacji, Gdańsk 2006, s. 158.
  5. Wierzbicki P., Struktura kłamstwa, Londyn 1987.