Skip to content

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media

Autobiografia Literatura Kultura Media
nr 1 (22) 2024
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
130
Publications
321
H-index
5
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.04
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 2 2018: 0 2019: 4 2020: 6 2021: 17 2022: 16 2023: 23 2024: 16 2025: 29 2026: 16 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017312
2018260
2019304
2020316
20213017
20222516
20233423
20242716
20252929
2026016

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Christine Brooke-Rose’s Remake: Constraints as Modes of Loosening the Author

DOI: 10.18276/au.2024.1.22-01
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The author analyses Christine Brooke-Rose’s autobiographical novel "Remake" in light of three notions devised by cultural theorist Lauren Berlant: ‘loosening,’ ‘inconvenience,’ and ‘infrastructure.’ Brooke-Rose was a multilingual writer of fiction and non-fiction, a translator, literary critic, and academic teacher. She created peculiar lipograms as well as other kinds of constraints in her novels long before they became markers of the French group OuLiPo. The author of the article argues that the experimental, autofictional narratives she developed towards the end of her life – among them Remake – stemmed from her experiences of cultural and geographical exile, and as such may be interpreted through the lens of affect theory.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Arbona, Javier et al. “Reading for Infrastructure,” accessed 24.03.2024, UCHRI.org, https://uchri.org/foundry/reading-for-infrastructure/.
  2. Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism, Durham: Duke UP, 2011.
  3. Berlant, Lauren. On the Inconvenience of Other People, Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2022.
  4. Bollas, Christopher. The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia UP, 1987.
  5. Boncza-Tomaszewski, “Christine Brooke-Rose: The Texterminator”, The Independent, 27.03.2005, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/christine-brookerose-the-texterminator-8427.html.
  6. Brooke-Rose, Christine. “Exsul,” Poetics Today 17 (1996): 289–303.
  7. Brooke-Rose, Christine. Invisible Author: Last Essays, Columbus: Ohio UP, 2002.
  8. Brooke-Rose, Christine. Life, End Of, Manchester: Carcanet, 2006.
  9. Brooke-Rose, Christine. Remake, Manchester: Carcanet, 1996.
  10. Brooke-Rose, Christine. “Remaking,” PN Review 1997, 23(3).
  11. Cavitch, Max. “Everybody’s Autotheory.” Modern Language Quarterly 2022, 83(1): 81–116, https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-9475043.
  12. Cvetkovich, Ann. “Format as infrastructure. Ann Cvetkovich on Lauren Berlant,” Capacious 2021 2(3).
  13. Darlington, Joseph. Christine Brooke-Rose and the Post-War Novel, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
  14. Darlington, Joseph. The Experimentalists; The Life and Times of the British Experimental Writers of the 1960s, New York: Bloomsbury, 2022.
  15. Lawrence, Karen. Techniques for living : Fiction and Theory in the Work of Christine Brooke-Rose. Columbus: Ohio UP, 2010.
  16. del Sapio Garbero, Maria. “A Conversation with Christine Brooke-Rose” [1991]. In Festschrift Volume One: Christine Brooke-Rose, Singapore: Verbivoracious Press, 2014.
  17. Saunders, Max. “Autofiction, Autobiografiction, Autofabrication, and Heteronymity: Differentiating Versions of the Autobiographical,” Biography 2020, 43(4): 763–780, https://doi.org/10.1353/bio.2020.0078.