Skip to content

Rocznik Komparatystyczny

Rocznik Komparatystyczny
6 (2015)
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
180
Publications
249
H-index
6
I10-index
3
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.15
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 3 2018: 4 2019: 24 2020: 44 2021: 20 2022: 15 2023: 14 2024: 17 2025: 12 2026: 13 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017203
201804
20192624
20203244
20211420
20221615
20231614
20241317
2025012
2026013

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

Kosmopolityzm awangardy a możliwość pisania regionalnej historii literatury. Przypadek „Zenitu” oraz „L’art contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna”*

DOI: 10.18276/rk.2015.6-11
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The avant-garde movements of Central and Eastern Europe are often confronted with the accusation of imitating Western European as well as Russian models. In response to such accusations, they emphasize their cosmopolitan approach to the avant-garde project. This attitude is manifested in a number of journals, multilingual and transnational in character (Contemporary Art – L’art contemporain, Zenith and Integral published in Poland, former Yugoslavia (currently Serbia) and Romania, respectively). In my analysis of the Polish avant-garde journal Sztuka współczesna – L’art contemporain (Contemporary Art – L’art contemporain), launched in 1929 by Jan Brzękowski, I address the relation between French surrealism and Brzękowski’s metarealism by presenting his conception as a manifestation of critical iteration. In my examination of the Serbian journal Zenit (Zenith), I try to show the ways in which the Eastern European avant-garde tried to demystify and dismantle the myths of modern art conceived by Western European artists. I give special consideration to the following: the function of avant-garde journals as a binding force between various centers of avant-garde activity, their role as a platform for Western ideas subject to revision and/or modification by Central European avant-gardists (the problem of influence), as well as their critical/ uncritical approach towards these novelties. Of great significance is the question of the programmatically transnational character of the avant-garde, in the context of which, at least theoretically, the quest for influence while evaluating this phenomenon should be dismissed as irrelevant. Quite conversely, however, it gets consolidated. By asking whether the history of Central and Eastern European avant-garde is pertinent, I propose a model of thinking about the experimental art of that part of Europe dissimilar from the one revolving around imitation.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (15)
  1. Between Worlds. A Sourcebook of Central European Avant-Gardes 1910–1930. Red. T.O. Benson, É. Forgács, Cambridge, Mass.–London: The MIT Press, 2002.
  2. Bojtár, Endre. „Awangarda wschodnioeuropejska jako kierunek literacki”. Miesięcznik Literacki 11 (1973): 31–44.
  3. Brzękowski, Jan. „Kilometraż 2”. L’art contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna 2 (1930a): 52–53.
  4. ---. „Kilometraż 3”. L’art contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna 3 (1930b): 91–92.
  5. ---. „Wystąpienie przeciw Pikassowi”. L’art contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna 3 (1930c): 103.
  6. ---. Wyobraźnia wyzwolona. Szkice i wspomnienia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1976.
  7. Dziamski, Grzegorz. „Awangarda Europy Wschodniej”. Wiek awangardy. Red. L. Bieszczad, Kraków: Universitas, 2006, 377–389.
  8. Głuchy brudnopis. Antologia manifestów awangard Europy Środkowej. Red. J. Kornhauser, K. Siewior. Przeł. K. Siewior i in. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2015.
  9. Hugnet, Georges. „Z Francji do Polski”. L’art contemporain – Sztuka Współczesna 2 (1930): 66.
  10. ---. „Nagroda, stypendjum czy zaopatrzenie inwalidzkie miasta Łodzi?”. Sztuki Piękne 8 (1932): 190.
  11. Micić, Ljubomir, Ivan Goll, Boško Tokin. Manifest zenitizma. Zagreb: 1. knjiga Biblioteke Zenit, 1921.
  12. ---. „Ja pozdravljam DaDaJok”. Dada Jok (1922): 4.
  13. Paczoska, Ewa, Mateusz Chmurski. „Słowo od redaktorów”. Przegląd Filozoficzno- Literacki 1–2 (2013): 9–12.
  14. Ve Poljanski, Branko. „Dada Antidada”. Dada Jok (1922): 7.
  15. ---. The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist Magazines. Vol. 3: Europe 1880–1940. Part II. Ed. P Brooker et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.