Skip to content
Studia Informatica Pomerania

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Informatica

nr 39
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1
References
19
Citations by year
YearCitations
20221

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
1

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.479 (2022)
View source (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Wielokryterialna metoda wspomagania decyzji PVM w wyborze kraju lokalizacji działalności gospodarczej


(Multi-criteria decision support method PVM in choosing the country’s business location)
DOI: 10.18276/si.2016.39-04
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2451-0424
eISSN:2300-410X
Authors: Kesra Nermend
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania

Danuta Miłaszewicz
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania
Keywords: PVM multi-criteria methods decision-making methods
Issue / book publication date:2016
Page range:11 (37-47)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Enable JavaScript to retrieve citation data.
CC BY-SA Open Access
QR code

Abstract

In the article the authors present the possibility of using multi-criteria method -PVM- (Preference Vector Method) to choose country of business location and registration. In the study the authors use the information from the database available on the portals World Bank Group from 2015 years, and the European Social Survey of 2014. The study involved 32 European countries, Kosovo and Israel. In the result of the case study, the countries are classified into four classes in terms of friendliness for starting a business.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (29)
  1. Benzing, C., Chu, H.M. (2009). A comparison of the motivations of small business owners in Africa. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16 (1), 60–77.
  2. Block J., Sandner, P. (2009). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs and their duration in self-employment: evidence from German micro data. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9 (2), 117–137.
  3. Deakins, D., Whittam, G. (2000). Business Start-up: Theory, Practice and Policy. W: S. Carter, D. Jones-Evans (red.), Enterprise and Small Business. Principles, Practice and Policy, Harlow: Financial Times.
  4. Duckstein, L., Gershon, M. (1983). Multicriterion analysis of a vegetation management problem using ELECTRE II. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 4, 254–261.
  5. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., Stephan U. (2013). Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, and Institutions: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship Across Nations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (3), 479–504.
  6. European Social Survey (2014). Pobrano z: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/round-index.html (18.12.2015).
  7. Friedman B.A., Aziz N., Keles I., Sayfullin S. (2012). Predictors of Students ` Desire to be an Entrepreneur: Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, and the United States. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 5 (9), 129–140.
  8. GEM (2011). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2010 Women’s Report. Pobrano z: http://www.gemconsortium.org/download@file (21.12.2015).
  9. Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., Pruett, M., Shinnar, R.S., Llopis, F., Toney, B. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: Differences among American, Asian and European students. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7 (2), 219–238.
  10. Grolleau, J., Tergny, J. (1971). Manuel de reference du programme ELECTRE II. Document de travail 24, SEMAMETRA International. Document Technique No. 24.
  11. Gorgievski, M., Ascalon, M.E., Stephan, U. (2011). Small business owners’ success criteria, a values approach to personal differences. Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (2), 207–232.
  12. Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr. Przegląd Statystyczny, 15, 307–326.
  13. Jayawarna D., Rouse J., Kitching J. (2011). Entrepreneur motivations and life course. International Small Business Journal, 31 (1), 34–56.
  14. Karagiannidis, A., Moussiopoulos, N. (1997). Application of ELECTRE III for the integrated management of municipal solid wastes in the greater Athens area. European Journal of Operational Research, 97, 439–449.
  15. Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Naux, J.-P. (2001). Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 263–275.
  16. Nermend, K. (2007). Regions Grouping with Similarity Measure Based on Vector Calculus. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16, 132–136.
  17. Nermend, K. (2015). Wielokryterialna metoda wektora preferencji jako narzędzie wspomagające proces decyzyjny, Przegląd Statystyczny, 62, 71–92.
  18. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  19. Saaty, T. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
  20. Scharlig, A. (1996). Pratiquer ELECTRE et PROMETHEE: Un Complement`a Decider sur Plusieurs Crit`eres. Lausanne: Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes,
  21. Stephan, U., Hart, M., Mickiewicz, T., Drews, C.-Ch. (2015a). Understanding Motivations for Entrepreneurship, Bis Research Paper, 212. Pobrano z: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/408432/bis-15-132-understanding-motivations-for-entrepreneurship.pdf (19.12.2015).
  22. Stephan, U., Hart, M., Drews, C.-Ch. (2015b). Understanding Motivations for Entrepreneurship. A Review of Recent Research Evidence. Rapid Evidence Assessment Paper, February. Pobrano z: http://www.enterpriseresearch.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Understanding-Motivations-for-Entrepreneurship-Rapid-evidence-assessment-paper.pdf (17.12.2015).
  23. Szarucki, M., Ericsson, B., Larsson, P. (2007). Motywy przedsiębiorczości w Polsce i w Szwecji, Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 10, 81–88.
  24. Tarnawa, A., Zadura-Lichota, P., Zbierowski, P., Nieć, M. (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Polska. Raport z badań 2013, Warszawa: PARP.
  25. Vallée, D., Zielniewicz, P. (1994a). Electre III-IV, version 3. x (aspects méthodologiques. Tome 1). PARIS: Université de Paris Dauphine.
  26. Vallée, D., Zielniewicz, P. (1994b) Electre III-IV, version 3. x. Guide d’utilisation (tome 2). Paris: Université de Paris Dauphine.
  27. World Bank Group (2015a). Doing Business. Pobrano z: http://www.doingbusiness.org/ (17.12.2015).
  28. World Bank Group (2015b). World Development Indicators. Pobrano z: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?Code=NY.GDP.PCAP.CD&id=af3ce82b&report_name=Popular_indicators&populartype=series&ispopular=y (20.12.2015).
  29. Zbierowski, P., Węcławska, D., Tarnawa, A., Zadura-Lichota, P., Bratnicki, M. (2012). Global entrepreneurship monitor – Polska, Katowice: PARP.