Skip to content
Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

nr 47/2 2017
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
0
References
5

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
0

Data retrieved:

Showing the last available data. An update is pending or has failed.

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Identyfikacja gospodarczych, społecznych i środowiskowych oddziaływań rozwoju technologii energetyki niskoemisyjnej w Polsce


(Identification of economic, social and environmental effects of low-emission energy technologies development in Poland)
DOI: 10.18276/sip.2017.47/2-08
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:2450-7733
eISSN:2300-4096
Authors: Magdalena Ligus
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu
Keywords: renewable energy nuclear energy Delphi method sustainable development
Issue / book publication date:2017
Page range:10 (89-98)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
Klasyfikacja JEL: Q01 Q28 Q56
CC BY-SA Open Access
QR code

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and assess the relevance of economic, social and environmental impacts of low-emission energy technologies in the context of their impact on social well-being within the meaning of the sustainable development paradigm. The Delphi method was used as a heuristic method.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts, Management Science, 9 (3), 458–467.
  2. IRENA (2016). Renewable Energy Benefits: Measuring the Economics. Abu Dhabi.
  3. IRENA, CEM (2014). The Socio-Economic Benefits of Solar and Wind Energy. Abu Dhabi. ISI, Ecofys, EEG, Rütter + Partner Socioeconomic Research + Consulting, LEI, SEURECO
  4. Karlsruhe (2014). EMPLOY-RES – Employment and growth effects of sustainable energies in the European Union.
  5. Jeżowski, P. (2016). Wkład ekonomii heterodoksyjnej do koncepcji rozwoju zrównoważonego. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 3 (81), 3–19.
  6. Krupowicz, J. (2008). Metody heurystyczne. W: M. Cieślak (red.), Prognozowanie gospodarcze: metody i zastosowania (s. 201–222). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  7. Lévêque, F. (2015). The Economics and Uncertainties of Nuclear Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ligus, M. (2017). Ranking technologii energetyki niskoemisyjnej w kontekście stopnia realizacji celów zrównoważonego rozwoju – badanie z zastosowaniem metody wielokryterialnej (MCDA). Acta Energetica (w druku).
  9. Shen, Y.-C., Lin, G.T.R., Li, K.-P., Yuan B.J.C. (2010). An Assessment of Exploiting Renewable Energy Sources with Concerns of Policy and Technology. Energy Policy, 38, 4604–4616.
  10. UK Energy Research Centre (2014). Low Carbon Jobs: the Evidence for Net Job Creation from Policy Support for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. London.
  11. United Nation (2015). Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York.
  12. UNU-IHDP, UNEP (2014). Inclusive Wealth Report 2014. Measuring Progress Toward Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.