Skip to content

Studia Maritima

Studia Maritima
Vol. 27/2 2014
OpenAlex

For the whole journal, according to OpenAlex.

Citations
48
Publications
148
H-index
2
I10-index
0
Mean citedness (2 years)
0.00
Citations received by year
Journal citation chart. Exact values are available in the table below. 2017: 0 2018: 1 2019: 1 2020: 4 2021: 1 2022: 5 2023: 7 2024: 14 2025: 5 2026: 4 2017 2026
Show data table
Citations received by year
YearPublicationsCitations
2017130
2018131
2019111
202084
202181
2022125
2023137
2024814
2025125
202604

Data retrieved:

What do these numbers mean?

Publications and citations cover records linked to this journal in OpenAlex. H-index is the largest number h of publications with at least h citations each. I10-index counts publications cited at least 10 times. The chart shows citations received in each year; the current year is incomplete. Coverage may differ from WNUS and other services.

The 2-year mean is an OpenAlex metric. It is not the Clarivate Journal Impact Factor.

View in OpenAlex (new tab)
Google Scholar

HÖHEPUNKT DER KAMPFZEIT – DIE POMMERSCHE NSDAP ZWISCHEN AUFLÖSUNG UND MACHTERGREIFUNG 1931–1934


(THE PEAK OF THE FIGHT – THE POMERANIAN NSDAP BETWEEN DISBANDMENT AND TAKEOVER 1931–1934)
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The article concerns the role of violence while takeover of the National Socialists in Pomerania. Another aim is the explanation of the influence of state control surveillance measures on the strategic organization of the party’s inner life. Mittenzwei states that the NSDAP-history in Pomerania was dominated by many internal conflicts. These conflicts not only raise to question about action potential of the regional party authorities but also influenced the abilities of the whole party. Even if the Stennes’ revolt did not cause a sustainable division in the party and even if the state control surveillance ended up with no party prohibition, the circumstances reflected the influence on the party organization. In spite of the feared party prohibition the NSDAP-Gauleitung in Pomerania regarded itself being incapable of backing away from the violent takeover course. The Gauleiter Wilhelm Karpenstein saw in view of the inner conflicts in the party and revolting SA formations the only option: he put himself against the directives of the NSDAP-Reichsleitung at the head of the group which demanded a violent takeover and called for violence repeatedly. Finally, this strategy allowed the takeover in the countrified Pomerania but it caused also the end of Wilhelm Karpenstein as the Pomeranian Gauleiter. This end took place with the imprisonment of the Pomeranian SA-leader within so called Röhm revolt. This was also the reason after the Karpenstein’s dismissal to replace the Gau’s elite with Schwede-Coburg who surrounded himself with familiar faces from his times in Coburg.
Preview PDF

Open PDF