ISSN: 2450-7741
eISSN: 2300-4460
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/frfu.2017.88/1-32
Issue archive /
4/2017
Raportowanie CSR w piśmiennictwie naukowym – analiza bibliometryczna
(CSR REPORTING IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE – BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS)
| Authors: |
Łukasz
Matuszak
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu Ewa Różańska Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu |
| Keywords: | CSR reporting bibliometric analysis HistCite |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2017 |
| Page range: | 14 (323-336) |
Abstract
Purpose – Presentation of the results of a bibliometric analysis of scienti c publications on CSR reporting, published between 1945 and 2017 in the Web of Science.
Design/methodology/approach – The study used the main methods of bibliometric analysis and was supplemented with HistCite software, which is a tool dedicated to this type of analysis.
Findings – The study has allowed the disclosure of changes in scienti c literature in the area of CSR reporting. The study identi ed authors and publications relevant for the development of CSR reporting.
Originality/value – According to the best knowledge of the authors, this study is the rst in Poland bibliometric analysis based on the presented methodology and on the CSR reporting. The study contributes to our better understanding of evolution of CSR reporting in accounting. The study was carried out using the HistCit tool, objectifying the results of the analysis. This tool also allowed for the visualization of links between publications in the form of histograph. The study’s limitation is, among others, the fact that the study covers only one database.
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Chen, S., Bouvain, P. (2009). Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 299–317. |
| 2. | Cooper, S.M., Owen, D.L. (2007). Corporate Social Reporting and Stakeholder Accountability: The Missing Link. Accounting Organizations And Society, 32 (7–8), 649–667. |
| 3. | De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. |
| 4. | Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A., Yang Y.G. (2011). Voluntary Non nancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Accounting Review, 86 (1), 59–100. |
| 5. | Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2014/95/UE z 22 października 2014 r. zmieniająca dyrektywę 2013/34/UE w odniesieniu do ujawniania informacji nie nansowych i informacji dotyczących różnorodności przez niektóre duże jednostki oraz grupy. OJ L 330, 15.11.2014. |
| 6. | Fortanier, F., Kolk, A., Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR Reporting MNEs and Global CSR Standards. Management International Review, 51 (5), 665–696. |
| 7. | Golob, U., Bartlett, J.L. (2007). Communicating about Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparative Study of CSR Reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33 (1), 1–9. |
| 8. | Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27 (1–2), 55–68. |
| 9. | Kincewicz, K., Żemigała, M., Mijał, M. (2012). Bibliometria w zarządzaniu technologiami i badaniami naukowymi. Warszawa: MNiSW. |
| 10. | King, J. (1987). A Review of Bibliometric and Other Science Indicators and Their Role in Research Evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13 (5), 261–276. |
| 11. | Krysztofiak-Szopa, J. (2006). Badania cytowań w Filozo i Nauki. Pobrano z: BadaniacytowawFN-JuliaKrysztofiak-Szopa.pdf (29.08.2009). |
| 12. | Mio, C. (2010). Corporate Social Reporting in Italian Multi-utility Companies: An Empirical Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 17 (5), 247–271. |
| 13. | Morhardt, J.E. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting on the Internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19 (7), 436–452. |
| 14. | Nowak, P. (2006). Bibliometria, webometria. Podstawy. Wybrane zastosowania. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. |
| 15. | Olczyk, M. (2015). Konkurencyjność w literaturze ekonomicznej – analiza bibliometryczna. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 401, 338–348. |
| 16. | Pindlowa, W. (1989). Bibliometria, informetria i scientometria – refleksje terminologiczne i wzajemne relacje. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Zeszyty Historycznoliterackie, 74, 63–73. |
| 17. | Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78 (1–2), 47–64. |
| 18. | Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30 (1), 83–106. |
| 19. | Stefaniak, B. (2008). Bibliometria w zarządzaniu informacją. W: D. Pietruch-Reizes (red.), Zarządzanie informa- cją w nauce (s. 17–32). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. |
| 20. | Ustawa z dnia 15 grudnia 2016 r. o zmianie ustawy o rachunkowości. Dz.U. 2017, poz. 61. |
| 21. | Vuontisjarvi, T. (2006). Corporate Social Reporting in the European Context and Human Resource Disclosures: An Analysis of Finnish Companies. Journal Of Business Ethics, 69 (4), 331–354. |
| 22. | Webster, B.M. (2001). O potrzebie tworzenia lokalnych indeksów cytowań dla analizy nauk społecznych (ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem socjologii). Elektroniczny Biuletyn Informacyjny Bibliotekarzy. Pobrano z: http://www.ebib.pl/2001/29/bwebster.html (24.02.2017). |
| 23. | Wouters, P. (1999). Beyond the Holy Grail: From Citation Theory to Indicator Theories. Scientometrics, 44 (3), 561–580. |