Skip to content
Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Informatica

Currently: Studia Informatica Pomerania

ZN 863 SI nr 36
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
4
References
3
Citations by year
YearCitations
20202
20241
20261

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
2

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
4

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.25167/sk.5871 (2025)
  2. 10.24425/fmc.2023.148756 (2024)
  3. 10.37055/nsz/132941 (2020)

The list may include only some citations. Check the source for full coverage.

View source (new tab)
Google Scholar
Find in Google Scholar (new tab)

Ocena wiarygodności informacji w serwisach internetowych


(Information reliability evaluation of internet services)
DOI: 10.18276/si.2015.36-08
Cite

The full text is available

ISSN:0867-1753
eISSN:2300-410X
Authors: Michał Nowakowski
Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, Instytut Informatyki w Zarządzaniu
Keywords: infobrokering strategies for information retrieval expert method criterions of information quality evaluation reliability of the information quality of the information
Issue / book publication date:2015
Page range:12 (103-114)
OAI-PMH:Metadata
Cited-by (Crossref) ?: Enable JavaScript to retrieve citation data.
CC BY-SA Open Access
QR code

Abstract

The article presents the issues of information quality and reliability evaluation available on the Internet. The criterions of information quality evaluation were firstly characterized due to electronic documents and electronic media that provide them. In the next step it were proposed three different methods of criterions evaluation, such as the expert method, technical and statistical methods. At the end it were described three practical strategies for information retrieval and evaluation of their quality and reliability for the selected criterions and methods.

PDF

Download PDF
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Adams S. (2003), Information Quality, Liability, and Corrections, vol. 27, no. 5, www.infotoday.com/online/sep03/adams.shtml.
  2. Antoszkiewicz J. (1990), Metody heurystyczne. Twórcze rozwiązywanie problemów, PWE, Warszawa.
  3. Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask, UC Berkeley – Teaching Library Internet Workshops, www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html.
  4. Evaluating Information Found on the Internet, www.guides.library.jhu.edu/c.php?g=202581&p=1334997.
  5. Bednarek-Michalska B. (2007), Ocena jakości informacji elektronicznej. Pułapki sieci, EBIB, 5, www.ebib.info/2007/86/a.php?bednarek.
  6. Bremer A. (2011), Popularne usługi internetowe, Videograf Edukacja Sp. z o.o., Chorzów.
  7. Cieślak M. (1997), Prognozowanie gospodarcze. Metody i zastosowania.
  8. Gemius Ranking, Wyszukiwarki – domeny, www.ranking.pl/pl/rankings/search-enginesdomains.html (30.01.2015).
  9. Holmes M. (1996), The multiple dimensions of information quality, „Information System Management”, vol. 13, no. 2.
  10. Kalbach J. (2008), Projektowanie nawigacji strony WWW. Optymalizacja funkcjonalności witryny, Wydawnictwo Helion/O’Reilly.
  11. Karciarz M., Dutko M. (2010), Informacja w Internecie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  12. Kliszczak M. (2014), Jakie są najpopularniejsze wyszukiwarki internetowe w Polsce i na świecie?, Eactive Blog, www.eactive.pl/pozycjonowanie-stron/jakie-sa-najpopularniejsze-wyszukiwarki-internetowe-w-polsce-i-na-swiecie (30.01.2015).
  13. Mascott L. (2006), Ensuring the quality information, „KM Review”, vol. 8, no. 6.
  14. Mirecka E. (2003), Wyszukiwanie, selekcjonowanie i gromadzenie informacji, cz. 1, WSiP, Warszawa.
  15. www.infobrokerska.pl/publikacje/wywiad-gospodarczy-a-infobrokering.
  16. www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze.
  17. www.wiarygodnosc.cba.pl/wstepne.html.