ISSN: 2080-4881
eISSN: 2300-4096
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/sip.2016.44/2-07
Issue archive /
nr 44/2 2016
Percepcja faktów w ekonomii głównego nurtu
(Perception of the facts in mainstream economics)
| Authors: |
Jakub
Gazda
Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu |
| Keywords: | new neoclassical synthesis real business cycle theory “stylized facts” |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2016 |
| Page range: | 10 (87-96) |
| Klasyfikacja JEL: | B22 E12 E13 |
Abstract
The aim of the article is to reconstruct and systematize the perception of the facts in mainstream economics, especially in light of the concept of “stylized facts”. “Stylized facts” can be defined as a general regularities of identified features of the economic time series. The concept of “stylized facts” served a key role in the development of economic thought the end of the twentieth century. It constituted the core of both school Real Business Cycle (RBC) as well as the plane consensus in the course of crystallization of the New Neoclassical Synthesis NNS and emerging of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium models (DSGE) within it. The strength of the facts is their independence from the theoretical model and objectivity allowing consensus, often of paradigmatically opposite positions on the map of contemporary economics. In view of the above, facts for macroeconomics can be seen as kind of final falsification.
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Abel, A.B., Bernanke, B.S. (2001). Macroeconomics. New York: Addison-Wesley. |
| 2. | Bludnik, I. (2010). Nowa synteza neoklasyczna w makroekonomii. Bank i Kredyt, 41 (2), 43–70. |
| 3. | Burns, A., Mitchell, W. (1946). Measuring Business Cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. |
| 4. | Cooley, T.F. (1997). Calibrated Models. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13 (3), 55–69. |
| 5. | Cooley, T.F., Prescot, E.C. (1995). Economic Growth and Business Cycles. W: T.F. Cooley (red.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, s. 15–16. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
| 6. | Gazda, J. (2011). Próba identyfi kacji tendencji recesyjnych w Polsce z zastosowaniem modeli realnego cyklu koniunkturalnego. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, 215, 39–50. |
| 7. | Goodfriend, M., King, R.G. (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12. |
| 8. | Hamilton, J.D. (2005). What’s Real About the Business Cycle. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87, 435–452. |
| 9. | Kydland, F.E., Prescott, E.C. (1996). The Computional Experiment: An Econometric Tool. Journal of Economic Perspective, 10, 69–85. |
| 10. | Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1980). Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12, Part 2, 696–715. |
| 11. | Lucas, R.E. Jr. (1977). Understanding Business Cycles. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 5, 7–29. |
| 12. | Morgan, M. (2012). The World in the Model: how Economist Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| 13. | Morgan, M. (2011). Traveling Facsts, How well do facts travel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| 14. | Rebelo, S. (2005). Real Business Cycle Models: Past, Present, and Future. NBER Working Paper, 11401, June. |
| 15. | Sargent, T.J. (1979). Macroeconomic Theory. New York: Academic Press. |
| 16. | Snowdon, B., Vane, H.R., Wynarczyk, P. (1998). Współczesne nurty teorii makroekonomii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. |
| 17. | Wojtyna, A. (2014). Czy kryzys w teorii ekonomii jest głębszy niż w gospodarce? Ekonomista, 3. |
| 18. | Zarnovitz, V. (1985). Recent Work on Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Literature, 23, s. 523–580. |
| 19. | Zarnowitz, V. (1992). Buisness Cycles: Theory, History, Indicators and Forecasting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |