ISSN: 2450-775X
eISSN: 2353-2874
OAI
DOI: 10.18276/miz.2017.49-01
Issue archive /
nr 3 (49) 2017
Podejście scenariuszowe w badaniach marketingowych - zastosowanie i ograniczenia
(Scenario Approach in Marketing Research – Applications and Limitations)
| Authors: |
Ilona
Bondos
Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Wydział Ekonomiczny Marcin Lipowski Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Wydział Ekonomiczny |
| Keywords: | scenarios scenario approach marketing research quasi experiment |
| Data publikacji całości: | 2017 |
| Page range: | 9 (9-17) |
| Klasyfikacja JEL: | M31 C83 |
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain the essence of the scenario approach in marketing research and to evaluate its limitations and applications. This research approach is rarely used by Polish researchers (much more often by authors of publications in reputable foreign journals). Meanwhile, the scenario approach is very useful in solving many scientific problems because of the possibility of circumventing the limitations of anticipating the influence of certain dependent variables on the behaviours of the investigated entities. Scenarios allow testing in one study tools that would ordinarily require longitudinal approaches to measure dependent variables. In this sense, scenarios provide valuable information with a significant reduction in input expenditure from primary sources. The basis for the evaluations and conclusions were examples of the scenario approach in research articles as well as authors’ own research experience. The last part of the paper presents the authors’ position of recommending the scenario approach as extremely useful in marketing research as well as valuable tips on how to use the method.
Download file
Article file
Bibliography
| 1. | Bitner, M.J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69‒82. |
| 2. | Bondos, I. (2014). Ewolucja w zakresie metod wykorzystywanych do badania cen. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 337, 205‒215. |
| 3. | Bondos, I., Lipowski, M. (2016). Effectiveness of PWYW – are there interchannel differences? MakeLearn & TIIM Conference. Proceedings. Timisoara, Rumunia. |
| 4. | Bondos, I. (2016). Funkcjonalność partycypacyjnego mechanizmu cenowego pay what you want. Studia i Prace WNEiZ, 43 (2), 17‒27. |
| 5. | Czakon, W. (2009). Mity o badaniach jakościowych w naukach o zarządzaniu. Przegląd Organizacji, 9, 13‒17. |
| 6. | Choi, S., Mattila, A.S. (2009). Perceived fairness of price differences across channels: The moderating role of price frame and norm perceptions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17 (1), 37‒47. |
| 7. | Daszyńska-Żygadło, K. (2012). Podejście scenariuszowe w zarządzaniu ryzykiem. Annales UMCS Sectio H. Oeconomia, 46 (4), 75‒84. |
| 8. | Falk, A., Heckman, J.J. (2009). Lab Experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326 (5942), 535‒538. |
| 9. | Gierszewska, G., Romanowska, M. (2009). Analiza strategiczna przedsiębiorstwa. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. |
| 10. | Hogarth, R.M. (2005). The challenge of representative design in psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12 (2), 253‒263. |
| 11. | Kim, J.-H., Jang, SCh. (2014). A scenario-based experiment and a field study: A comparative examination for service failure and recovery. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, 125‒132. |
| 12. | Komor, M. (2011). Znaczenie i rozwój metod jakościowych w badaniach empirycznych w marketingu. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 236, 215‒224. |
| 13. | Levitt, S.D., List, J.A. (2007). Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian Journal of Economics, 40 (2), 347‒370. |
| 14. | Maison, D. (2010). Jakościowe metody badań marketingowych. Jak zrozumieć konsumenta. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. |
| 15. | Mazurek-Łopacińska, K., Sobocińska, M. (2016). Consumer Intelligence w kontekście kierunków rozwoju badań marketingowych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 459, 11‒19. |
| 16. | Mazurek-Łopacińska, K., Sobocińska, M. (2013). Ewolucja ram konceptualnych marketingu a zmiany w obszarach, metodach i technikach badawczych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 909, 5‒15. |
| 17. | Neuman W.L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. |
| 18. | Olejniczuk-Merta, A. (2014). Ewolucja w badaniach marketingowych. Marketing i Rynek, 9, 2‒7. |
| 19. | Orne, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17 (11), 776‒783. |
| 20. | Porowska, D. (2016). Kierunki rozwoju badań konsumenckich w świetle założeń ekonomii behawioralnej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 459, 70‒78. |
| 21. | Trampe, D., Konuş, U., Verhoef, P.C. (2014). Customer responses to channel migration strategies toward the e-channel. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 257‒270. |
| 22. | Xia, L., Monroe, K.B. (2010). Is a good deal always fair? Examining the concepts of transaction value and price fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31 (6), 884‒894. |
| 23. | Xie, Y., Peng, S. (2009). How to repair customer trust after negative publicity: The roles of competence, integrity, benevolence, and forgiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 26 (7), 572‒589. |