Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski

Poland's Demographic Past

ISSN: 0079-7189    OAI    DOI: 10.18276/pdp.2015.1.37-05

Lista wydań / 37, 2015, nr 1
Komputerowa mikrosymulacja sieci krewniaczej a wzorce współmieszkania: rzecz o demograficznych uwarunkowaniach rodziny chłopskiej w okresie staropolskim

Autorzy: Mikołaj Szołtysek
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthrpology, Halle/Saale
Słowa kluczowe: family household network of relatives peasants Crown (of the Kingdom of Poland) Lithuania Ukraine 17th–18th centuries
Data publikacji całości:2015
Liczba stron:55 (107-161)
Cited-by (Crossref) ?:


Resuming the threads that appeared in the book recently published Rethinking East-Central Europe: Family Systems and Co-Residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Bern et al., Peter Lang, 2015) the author of this article presents the application of a computer micro-simulation of kin sets in the research on the demographic determinants of the structure of the residential family and the patterns of co-residence in the old-Polish era for the first time in the Polish literature. The first part of the article contains a review of the methods concerning the demographic determinants of the structure of the residential family and the patterns of co-habitation, and the essence of the experiment of demographic simulation, as well as some selected examples of its application in historical demography. For some time now this question has been widely discussed abroad (Laslett, Ruggles, Oeppen), but in the Polish literature there is no a single study dealing with that. The second part presents the source basis of the article; it is the database of the nominative censuses of 26,652 peasant households from the territories of the Crown, Lithuania and Ukraine from the end of the 18th century (CEURFAMFORM Database). The methodology of the applied micro-simulation model has also been discussed. A lot of space has been devoted to the question of the choice of outside parameters and the validation of the model, as a way to a better structuralisation of regional research on the old-Polish demography. It would be quite useful if the efforts of researchers might concentrate on fixing the necessary minimum programme for future analyses in microscale family reconstitution, so that their results would have a wider applicability in research of a higher rank (not only the one in which simulation modelling is used), and so that they would satisfy the basic requirements of comparative analysis. The third part deals with the applicability potential of the used methodology to analyse the influence of demographic factors on the co-residence patterns for old-Polish populations taken from the database CEURFAMFORM. The problem has been illustrated by presenting two current questions that are essential for historical demography of the family: the process of leaving the family house and co-habitation of various generations. The analysis shows how the combined impact of fertility, mortality and the generational overlap in their regional configurations, determining the number and category of the relatives in a given population, shaped the dominant patterns of co-habitation in the territories that have been researched. The conclusions should be treated as innovative, yet future investigations might verify that. For the time being they constitute a convenient map that indicates directions for further investigations, both quantitative and qualitative in nature.
Pobierz plik

Plik artykułu


1.Agata Żółtaszek, Modele mikrosymulacyjne. Teoria i zastosowania ekonomiczno-społeczne, Łódź 2013.
2.Andre Burguière, Francois Lebrun, The One Hundred and One Families of Europe, [w:] A History of the Family, vol. 2: The Impact of Modernity, red. Andre Burguiere, Christaine Klapisch-Zuber, Martine Segalen, Françoise Zonabend, Cambridge 1996, s. 11-94.
3.Andrejs Plakans, Charles Wetherell, The kinship domain in an Eastern European peasant community: Pinkenhof, 1833–1850, ,,The American Historical Review” 93, 1988, 2, s. 359-386.
4.Anna Giza-Poleszczuk, Rodzina i system rodzinny, [w:] Wymiary życia społecznego. Polska na przełomie XX i XXI wieku, red. Mirosława Marody, Warszawa 2002, s. 272-301.
5.Anslay J. Coale, Shaomin Li, Jingqing Han, The distribution of interbirth intervals in rural China, 1940s to 1970s, “Papers of the East-West Population Institute” 109, 1988, Honolulu: East-West Center.
6.Antoinette Fauve-Chamoux, Family reproduction and stem-family system: From Pyrenean valleys to Norwegian farms, “The History of the Family” 11, 2006, 3, s. 171-184.
7.Arthur P. Wolf, Fertility in prerevolutionary rural China, [w:] Family and Population in East Asian History, red. Susan Hanley, Arthur P. Wolf, Stanford 1985, s. 154-185.
8.Bartosz Ogórek, „Należy przestać spluwać dzieci na prawo i lewo!”. Przejście płodności w populacji II Rzeczpospolitej, w przygotowaniu.
9.Brian Bradley, Franklin Mendels, Can the Hypothesis of a Nuclear Family Be Tested Empirically?, “Population Studies” 32, 1978, s. 381-394.
10.Cezary Kuklo, Demografia Rzeczypospolitej przedrozbiorowej, Warszawa 2009.
11.Cezary Kuklo, Kamecka Małgorzata, Marriage Strategies in Poland: Social and Spatial Differences (16th-18th Centuries), “Historical Social Research” 28, 2003, 3, s. 29-43.
12.Cezary Kuklo, Kobieta samotna w społeczeństwie miejskim u schyłku Rzeczypospolitej szlacheckiej. Studium demograficzno-społeczne, Białystok 1998.
13.Clare Holdsworth, David Morgan, Transitions in Context. Leaving Home, Independence and Adulthood, Oxford 2005.
14.Colin G. Pooley, Jean Turnbull, Migration from the parental home in Britain since the eighteenth century, [w:] The Road to Independence: Leaving Home in Western and Eastern Societies, 16th-20th Centuries, red. Frans W. A. van Poppel, Michel Oris, James Z. Lee, Bern 2004, s. 375-402.
15.Daniel Devolder, Effects of the European late marriage pattern on kinship: A study using a microsimulation model, [w:] When Dad died: individuals and families coping with family stress in past societies, red. Renso Derosas, Michel Oris, Bern 2002, s. 325-350.
16.Daniel S. Smith, A homeostatic demographic regime: patterns in West European family reconstitution studies, [w:] Population patterns in the past, red. Ronald D. Lee, New York 1977, s. 107–122.
17.Danuta Daszkiewicz-Ordyłowska, Rodzina w parafii toszeckiej w latach 1789–1877, [w:] Śląskie Studia Demograficzne, t. 5: Rodzina, red. Z. Kwaśny, Wrocław 2001, s. 75–109.
18.David S. Reher, Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts, “Population and Development Review” 4, 1998, 2, s. 203-234.
19.David S. Reher, Perspectives on the family in Spain, past and present, New York 1997.
20.Edmund Piasecki, Ludność parafii bejskiej (woj. kieleckie) w świetle ksiąg metrykalnych z XVIII-XX w. Studium demograficzne, Warszawa 1990.
21.Edward A. Wrigley, British population during the «long» eighteenth century, 1680-1840, [w:] The Cambridge economic history of modern Britain, t. 1: Industrialisation 1700-1860, red. Roderick Floud, Paul Johnson, Cambridge 2004, s. 57-95.
22.Edward A. Wrigley, Fertility Strategy for the Individual and the Group, [w:] Historical Studies of Changing Fertility, red. Charles Tilly, Princeton 1978, s. 135-154.
23.Edward A. Wrigley, Intrinsic growth rates and inheritance strategies: a perspective from historical demography, [w:] Distinct Inheritances: Property, family and community in a changing Europe, red. Hannes Grandits, Patrick Heady, Münster 2003, s. 69-95.
24.Edward A. Wrigley, Population in History, London 1969.
25.Edward A. Wrigley, Ros S. Davies, Jim E. Oeppen, Roger Schofield, English population history from family reconstitution, 1580-1837, Cambridge 1997.
26.Egon Vielrose, Ludność Polski od X do XVIII wieku, „Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej” 5, 1957, 1, s. 3-49.
27.Egon Vielrose, Przyczynek do demografii Galicji i Bukowiny w drugiej ćwierci wieku XIX, ”Przegląd Statystyczny” 8, 1961, 2, s. 137-154.
28.Egon Vielrose, Przyczynek do demografii wsi polskiej w XVIII w., „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 14, 1952, s. 122-135.
29.Egon Vielrose, Zastosowanie modelowych tablic populacji ustabilizowanych w demografii historycznej, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 10, 1978, s. 3-16.
30.Eugene A. Hammel, Demographic Constraints on the Formation of Traditional Balkan Households, “Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 44, 1990, s. 173-186.
31.Ewa Frątczak, Modelowanie cyklu życia jednostki i rodziny: teoria i praktyka, Warszawa 1999.
32.Family Demography: Methods and their Applications, red. John Bongaarts, Thomas Burch, Kenneth W. Wachter, Oxford 1987.
33.Frances Kobrin-Goldscheider, Julie DaVanzo, Semi-autonomy and Leaving Home in Early Adulthood, “Social Forces” 65, 1986, 1, s. 187-201.
34.Francesco C. Billari, Dimiter Philipov, Pau Baizán, Leaving home in Europe, “International Journal of Population Geography” 7, 2001, s. 339-356.
35.Irena E. Kotowska, Janina Jóźwiak, Nowa demografia Europy a rodzina, „Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych” 28, 2012, s. 9-33.
36.Jacek Siebel, Ludność parafii rzymsko-katolickiej pw. św. Szczepana w Bogucicach w latach 1738-1860. Studium demograficzno-statystyczne, rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice 2006.
37.Jack Goody, Comparing family systems in Europe and Asia: are there different sets of rules?, “Population and Development Review” 22, 1996, 1, s. 1-20.
38.James Z. Lee, Feng Wang, One quarter of humanity: Malthusian mythology and chinese realities, 1700–2000, Cambridge (MA) 1999.
39.Jan Paradysz, Współczesna demografia regionalna i kilka wniosków z niej wypływających dla innych badań w mikroskali, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 26, 2005, s. 167–189.
40.Jan Paradysz, Współczynniki powiększenia się potomstwa, „Studia Demograficzne” 3, 1984, s. 41-62.
41.Jan Pomorski, Paradygmat „New economic history”. Studium z teorii rozwoju nauki historycznej, Lublin 1985.
42.Jerzy Spychała, Rodzina w parafii Strzelce Opolskie w latach 1766–1870, [w:] Śląskie Studia Demograficzne, t. 5: Rodzina, red. Z. Kwaśny, Wrocław 2001, s. 7–74.
43.Jerzy Z. Holzer, Demografia, wyd. 6 zm., Warszawa 2003.
44.Jim Smith, Jim Oeppen, Estimating numbers of kin in historical England using demographic microsimulation, [w:] Old and New Methods in Historical Demography, red. David Reher i Roger Schofield, Oxford 1993, s. 280-317.
45.John Hajnal, Age at Marriage and Proportions Marrying, “Population Studies” 7, 1953, 2, s. 111-136.
46.John Hajnal, Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system, “Population and Development Review” 8, 1982, s. 449-494.
47.John Modell, Frank F. Furstenberg, Theodore Hershberg, Social Change and Transitions to Adulthood in Historical Perspective, JFH 1, 1976, s. 7-32.
48.Joseph Ehmer, House and the Stem Family in Austria, [w:] The Stem Family in Eurasian Perspective, s. 103-130.
49.Józef Obrębski , Polesie. Studia etnosocjologiczne, red. A. Engelking, Warszawa 2007.
50.Karl Kaser, The stem family in Eastern Europe: cross-cultural and trans-temporal perspectives, [w:] The Stem Family in Eurasian Perspective, s. 253-272.
51.Kenneth W. Wachter, Eugene A. Hammel, Laslett Peter, Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure, New York 1978.
52.Kenneth W. Wachter, Eugene A. Hammel, The Genesis of Experimental History, [w:] The World We Have Gained, red. Lloyd Bonfield, Richard Smith, Keith Wrightson, Oxford 1986.
53.Kevin Schürer, A note concerning the calculation of the singulate mean age at marriage, “Local Population Studies” 43, 1989, s. 67–70.
54.Kevin Schürer, Leaving home in England and Wales 1850-1920, [w:] The Road to Independence: Leaving Home in Western and Eastern Societies, 16th-20th Centuries, red. Frans W. A. van Poppel, Michel Oris, James Z. Lee, Bern 2004, s. 33-84.
55.Konrad Rzemieniecki, Ludność rzymskokatolickich parafii monasterzyskiej i petlikowskiej w XVIII wieku (archidiecezja lwowska), rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław 2006.
56.Lutz K. Berkner, The stem family and the developmental cycle of the peasant household: a eighteenth-century Austrian example, „The American Historical Review” 77, 1972, 2, s. 398–418.
57.Maciej Rodzewicz, Metody mikrosymulacyjne w prognozowaniu demograficznym, [w:] Nowe metodologiczne propozycje analiz w naukach społecznych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem demografii, red. Ewa Soja, Aneta Ptak-Chmielewska, Alicja Siwek, Maciej Rodzewicz, Sekcja Analiz Demograficznych KND, Warszawa 2000, s. 67–88.
58.Małgorzata Łatuszyńska, Metody symulacji komputerowej – próba klasyfikacji logicznej, „Studia i Materiały Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą” 41, 2011, s. 163-176.
59.Małgorzata Żmijewska, Ludność parafii tyskiej od 1749 roku do połowy XIX wieku w świetle ksiąg metrykalnych. Studium demograficzno-społeczne, rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice 2007.
60.Marion J. Levy, Aspects of the analysis of family structure, w: Aspects of the Analysis of Family Structure, red. Anslay J. Coale i in., Princeton 1965, s. 1-63.
61.Matteo Manfredini, Marco Breschi, Coresident and Non-Coresident Kin in an Italian Rural Community, “Annales de démographie historique” 1, 2005, s. 157-172.
62.Matthew Sobek, Sheela Kennedy, The Development of Family Interrelationship Variables for International Census Data, Minneapolis, “University of Minnesota Population Center Working Paper Series” No. 2009-02, Minneapolis 2009.
63.Matthijs Koen, Sara Moreels, The Antwerp COR*-database: A unique Flemish source for historical-demographic research, “The History of the Family” 15, 2010, 1, s. 109-115.
64.Michael W. Flinn, The European demographic system, 1500–1820, Baltimore 1981.
65.Michał Kopczyński, Studia nad rodziną chłopską w Koronie w XVII-XVIII wieku, Warszawa 1998.
66.Mieczysław Kędelski, Paradysz Jan, Demografia, Poznań 2006.
67.Mieczysław Kędelski, Umieralność i trwanie życia w Wielkopolsce w latach 1816-1875, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 16, 1985, s. 109-138.
68.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Central European household and family systems, and the “Hajnal-Mitterauer” line: the parish of Bujakow (18th-19th centuries), “The History of the Family” 12, 2007, 1, s. 19-42.
69.Mikołaj Szołtysek, De invloed van demografische parameters op familiestructuren in achttiende-eeuws Oost-Europa: Wat kunnen we leren door data van historische volkstellingen en uitkomsten van microsimulaties te vergelijken?, [w:] Familie en levenskansen in het verleden, red. Paul Puschmann, Richard Paping i Koenraad Matthijs. Leuven 2015, s. 153-182.
70.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Dowody i refutacje: wczoraj i dziś w historyczno-demograficznych studiach nad transformacją postaw prokreacyjnych, „Studia Demograficzne” 149, 2006, 1, s. 3-27.
71.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Family systems and welfare provision in the Polishd-Lithuanian Commonwealth: discrepancies and similarities, “Białoruskie Zeszyty Historyczne” 42, 2015, s. 194-227.
72.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Gruber Siegfried, Living arrangements of the elderly in two Eastern European joint-family societies: Poland-Lithuania around 1800 and Albania in 1918, “The Hungarian Historical Review” 3, 2014, 1, s. 101-140.
73.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Gruber Sigfried, Mosaic: Recovering Surviving Census Records and Reconstructing the Familial History of Eurasia, “Historical Methods” 21, 2016, 1, s. 38-60.
74.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Households and family systems in early modern Europe, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History, 1350-1750, Vol. I: Peoples and Place, red. Hamish Scott, Oxford 2015, s. 313-341.
75.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Life cycle service and family systems in the rural countryside: a lesson from historical east-central Europe,“Annales de démographie historique” 1, 2009, s. 53-94.
76.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Ludność parafii bujakowskiej w XVIII i XIX wieku. Między „unikalnym” systemem formowania się gospodarstw a swoistością pogranicza, rozprawa doktorska, Instytut Historii UWr, Wrocław 2003.
77.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Residence Patterns and Demographic Constraints: the Case of Historical Eastern Europe, “Journal of Family History” 40, 2015, 3, s. 323-350.
78.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Rethinking East-central Europe: family systems and co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Bern 2015.
79.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Rethinking Eastern Europe: household formation patterns in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and European family system, CCh 23, 2008, s. 389-427.
80.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Struktura gospodarstwa domowego w Koronie i na Litwie a funkcje rodziny w końcu XVIII wieku: rozbieżności czy podobieństwo?, [w:] Rodzina, gospodarstwo domowe i pokrewieństwo na ziemiach polskich w perspektywie historycznej — ciągłość czy zmiana?, red. Cezary Kuklo, Warszawa 2012, s. 173-208.
81.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Teoria rodziny w ujęciu Petera Lasletta i The Cambridge Group – ‘angielska tajna broń’, jej krytycy i jej ‘długie trwanie’, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 24, 2003, s. 7–44.
82.Mikołaj Szołtysek, The genealogy of Eastern European difference: an insider’s view, “Journal of Comparative Family Studies” 43, 2012, 3, s. 335-371.
83.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Three kinds of preindustrial household formation system in historical Eastern Europe: a challenge to spatial patterns of the European family, “The History of the Family” 13, 2008, 3, s. 223–257.
84.Mikołaj Szołtysek, Toward a conceptual framework for the variation in historical family and household systems across Eurasia, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 2014 (nr 36), s. 55-86.
85.Miriam King, All in the Family? The Incompatibility and Reconciliation of Family Demography and Family History, “Historical Methods” 23, 1990, s. 32–40.
86.Miriam King, Samuel H. Preston, Who Lives with Whom? Individual versus Household Measures,“Journal of Family History” 15, 1990, 2, s. 117-132.
87.Monica Das Gupta, Kinship systems and demographic regimes, [w:] Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis, red. David I. Kertzer, Tom Fricke, Chicago 1997, s. 36–52.
88.Myron P. Gutmann, Sara M. Pullum-Piñón, Thomas W. Pullum, Three Eras of Young Adult Home Leaving in Twentieth-Century America, “Journal of Social History” 35, 2002, s. 533-576.
89.Nancy Fitch, Review of "Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure", “Historical Methods” 13, 1980, s. 127-137.
90.Nancy Howell, Demography of the Dobe! Kung, New York 2009.
91.Olena J. Zamura, Smertnist' sil's'kogo naselennya Pereyaslavs'ko-Borispil's'koi eparkhii v seredini XVIII st. (na prikladi sil Barishivs'koi, Basans'koi ta Borispil's'koi protopopiĭ). Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Połtawski, Połtawa 2013.
92.Peter C. Smith, Indexes of nuptiality: Asia and the Pacific, „Asian and Pacific Census Forum” 5, 1978, 2, s. 1-13.
93.Peter Laslett, Age at sexual maturity in Europe since the Middle Ages, [w:] tegoż, Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations: Essays in Historical Sociology, Cambridge 1977, s. 214-232.
94.Peter Laslett, Family, kinship and collectivity as systems of support in preindustrial Europe: a consideration of the »nuclear-hardship« hypothesis, CCh 3, 1988, 2, s. 153-175.
95.Peter Laslett, Introduction: the history of the family, [w:] Household and family in past time, red. Peter Laslett, Richard Wall, Cambridge 1972, s. 16–19.
96.Peter Laslett, The family as a knot of individual interests, w: Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group, red. Robert Netting, Richard Wilk, and Eric Arnould, Berkeley 1984, s. 353-379.
97.Piotr Szukalski, Długookresowe przemiany umieralności a dostępność krewnych w okresie dzieciństwa i późnej starości, „Prace Instytutu Ekonometrii i Statystyki UŁ seria A”, 2007, nr 152, s. 5-36.
98.Piotr Szukalski, Sieroctwo biologiczne osób nieletnich w Polsce w długookresowej perspektywie, „Rocznik Socjologii Rodziny” 18, Poznań 2007, s. 163-186.
99.Piotr Szukalski, Wdowieństwo w starszym wieku w Polsce, „Gerontologia Polska” 14, 2006, 2, s. 63–70.
100.Piotr Szukalski, Wielkość i struktura rodziny a przejście demograficzne, „Rocznik Socjologii Rodziny” 16, 2005, s. 95–110.
101.Radosław Poniat, Wiek opuszczania rodzinnego gospodarstwa domowego w dobie stanisławowskiej w świetle zeznań sądowych, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 35, 2014, s. 7-40.
102.Richard H. Steckel, The age at leaving home in the United States, 1850-1860, “Social Science History” 20, 1996, s. 507-532.
103.Richard J. Udry, Robert L. Cliquet, A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between ages at menarche, marriage, and first birth, “Demography” 19, 1982, 1, s. 53-63.
104.Richard Saller, Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family, Cambridge 1994.
105.Robert Woods, The Demography of Victorian England and Wales, Cambridge 2000.
106.Rodzina i gospodarstwo domowe na ziemiach polskich w XV–XX wieku. Struktury demograficzne, społeczne i gospodarcze, red. Cezary Kuklo, Warszawa 2008.
107.Rodzina, gospodarstwo domowe i pokrewieństwo na ziemiach polskich w perspektywie historycznej – ciągłość czy zmiana?, red. Cezary Kuklo, Warszawa 2012.
108.Ronald R. Rindfuss, Philip S. Morgan, Marriage, Sex, and the First Birth Interval: The Quiet Revolution in Asia, “Population and Development Rview” 9, 1983, 2, s. 259-278.
109.Samuel Fogelson, Z badań nad demografią Polesia i Wołynia, Warszawa 1938.
110.Samuel H. Preston, Patrick Heuveline, Michel Guillot, Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes, Oxford 2001.
111.Siegfried Gruber, Mikołaj Szołtysek, Klüsener Sebastian, Goldstein Joshua R., Spatial variation in household structure in 19th-century Germany, “Population: English Edition” 69, 2014, 1, s. 55-80.
112.Siegfried Gruber, Mikołaj Szołtysek, Stem Families, Joint Families, and the European Pattern. What Kind of a Reconsideration Do We Need?, „Journal of Family History” 37, 2012, 1, s. 105-125.
113.Stanisław Borowski, Próba odtworzenia struktur społecznych i procesów demograficznych na Warmii u schyłku XVII w. na przykładzie Dobrego Miasta i okolicy, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 8, 1975, s. 125–198.
114.Stanisław Borowski, Rozwój demograficzny i problem maltuzjański na ziemiach polskich pod panowaniem niemieckim w latach: 1807–1914, "Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski" 3, 1969, s. 125-142.
115.Stefan Szulc, Dawne tablice wymieralności Królestwa Polskiego i miasta Warszawy, „Kwartalnik Statystyczny” 5, 1928, 2, s. 430-443.
116.Stefan Szulc, Ruch naturalny w Polsce w latach 1895-1935, „Statystyka Polski” 41, 1936 (Seria C), s. 1-132.
117.Stevan Harrell, Human Families. Social Change in Global Perspective, Oxford 1997.
118.Steven Ruggles, Confessions of a Microsimulator: Problems in Modeling the Demography of Kinship, “Historical Methods” 26 1993, s. 161-169.
119.Steven Ruggles, Family Demography and Family History: Problems and Prospects, “Historical Methods” 23, 1990, s. 22-30.
120.Steven Ruggles, Family interrelationships, “Historical Methods” 28, 1995, s. 52-58.
121.Steven Ruggles, Prolonged Connections: The Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth Century England and America, Madison 1987.
122.Steven Ruggles, Reconsidering the Northwest European Family System: Living Arrangements of the Aged in Comparative Historical Perspective, “Population and Development Rview” 35, 2009, 2, s. 249-273.
123.Steven Ruggles, Stem Families and Joint Families in Comparative Historical Perspective, “Population and Development Rview” 36, 2010, 3, s. 563-577.
124.Steven Ruggles, Susan Brower, The Measurement of Family and Household Composition in the United States, 1850-1999, “Population and Development Rview” 29, 2003, s. 73-101.
125.Steven Ruggles, The Future of Historical Family Demography, “Annual Review of Sociology” 38, 2012, s. 423-441.
126.Susan C. Watkins, On measuring transitions and turning points, “Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History” 13, 1980, 3, s. 181-186.
127.Susan De Vos, Leaving the Parental Home: Patterns in Six Latin American Countries, “Journal of Marriage and Family” 51, 1989, 3, s. 615-626.
128.Susan De Vos, Palloni Alberto, Formal Models and Methods for the Analysis of Kinship and Household Organization, “Population Index” 55, 1989, 2, s. 174-198.
129.The Stem Family in Eurasian Perspective. Revisiting House Societies, 17th-20th centuries, red. Antoinette Fauve-Chamoux i Emiko Ochiai, Bern 2009.
130.Timothy W. Guinnane, Age at Leaving Home in Rural Ireland: 1901-1911, “Journal of Economic History” 52, 1992, 3, s. 651-674.
131.Ulrich Pfister, Georg Fertig, The population history of Germany: research strategy and preliminary results, “MPIDR Working Papers” WP-2010-035, Rostock 2010.
132.Wang Feng, Yang Quanhe, Age at Marriage and the First Birth Interval: The Emerging Change in Sexual Behavior Among Young Couples in China, “Population and Development Review“ 22, 1996, 2, s. 299-320.
133.Wiaczesław Nosewicz, Tradicionnaja belorusskaja derevnja v evropejskoj perspektive, Mińsk 2004.
134.Zeng Yi, Ansley J. Coale, Minja K.Choe, Liu Zhiwu, Leaving the Parental Home: Census-based Estimates for China, Japan, South Korea, United States, France, and Sweden, “Population Studies” 48, 1994, 1, s. 65-80.
135.Zhongwei Zhao, Computer microsimulation and historical study of social structure: A comparative review of SOCSIM and CAMSIM, “Revista de Demografia Historica” 24, 2006, 2, s. 59-88.
136.Zhongwei Zhao, Coresidential patterns in historical China: A simulation study, PDR 26, 2000, s. 263-293.
137.Zhongwei Zhao, Demographic Conditions and Multi-generation Households in Chinese History. Results from Genealogical Research and Microsimulation, PS 48, 1994, 413-425.
138.Zhongwei Zhao, Demographic Conditions, Microsimulation, and Family Support for the Elderly: Past, Present and Future in China, [w:] The Locus of Care: Families, Communities, and Institutions in History, red. Peregrine Horden, Richard Smith, London 1998, s. 259–279.
139.Zhongwei Zhao, Demographic systems in historic China: some New findings from recent research, “Journal of the Australian Population Association” 14, 1997, 2, s. 201-232.
140.Zhongwei Zhao, The demographic transition in Victorian England and changes in English kinship networks, “Continuity and Change” 11, 1996, s. 243-272.