Skip to content
Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

nr 52/3 2018
OpenAlex

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
6
References
10
Citations by year
YearCitations
20181
20192
20221
20262

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
Crossref

Data describes this article or chapter.

Record found in the database

Citations
3

Data retrieved:

View source (new tab)
OpenCitations

Data describes this article or chapter.

Citations
3

Data retrieved:

Citing publications
  1. 10.5604/01.3001.0013.2368 (2019)
  2. 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5257 (2019)
  3. 10.15219/em93.1553 (2022)
View source (new tab)
Google Scholar

Sprawiedliwość wynagradzania a zaangażowanie pracowników


(Compensation justice and employee engagement)
DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.52/3-19
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the relationship between employee engagement and remuneration justice. Judgment of justice requires the determination of its identity. The need to redefine the concept of justice used in the field of management science was noticed. It indicated the nature of engagement and its connections with justice. Based on the results of empirical research the remuneration justice of Polish employees was diagnosed. The aspects of engagement correlated with the perception of justice were investigated. The conclusions from the conducted analysis contain the directions for further research into fairness of remuneration.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography (17)
  1. Adams, S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. W: L. Berkowitz (red.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (s. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
  2. Aon Hewitt (2017). Trends in Global Employee Engagement. Global anxiety erodes employee engagement gains. Pobrano z: http://www.aon.com/unitedkingdom/attachments/trp/2017-Trends-in-Global-Employee-Engagement.pdf.
  3. Arystoteles (1956). Etyka nikomachejska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  4. Bies, R.J. (2001). Interactional in (justice): the sacred and the profane. W: J. Greenberg, R. Cropanzano (red.), Advances in Organizational Justice (s. 89–118). Stanford: Stanford University.
  5. Card, D., Mas, A., Moretti, E., Saez, E. (2012). Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 6 (102), 2981–3003. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.6.2981.
  6. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C., Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
  7. Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 6 (31), 874–899. DOI: 10.1177/0149206305279602.
  8. Furnham, A. (2014). Justice at work in aid and development. W: Fairness in Aid Work Remuneration: A Human Resources Perspective. Workshop funded by ESRC/DFID, 3 April. London: University College.
  9. Juchnowicz, M. (2012). Zaangażowanie pracowników. Sposoby oceny i motywowania. Warszawa: PWE.
  10. Juchnowicz, M., Kinowska, H. (2017). Strategie wynagrodzeń w różnych strategiach biznesowych. W: A. Sopińska, P. Wachowiak (red.), Wyzwania współczesnego zarządzania strategicznego (s. 465–478). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  11. Kinowska, H. (2009). The influence of chosen structural factors on employee engagement. Education of Economists and Managers, 3 (13), 61–76.
  12. Mumford, K.A., Smith, P.N. (2012). Peer salaries and employee satisfaction in the workplace. IZA Discussion Paper, 6673. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  13. Petersen, B.K. (2014). Justice and culture in the perception of compensation fairness. Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia, 11, 9–24. DOI: 10.15678/AOC.2014.1102.
  14. Shuck, B., Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: a seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 1 (9), 89–110. DOI: 10.1177/1534484309353560.
  15. Thibaut, J., Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  16. Turek D. (2011). Sprawiedliwość organizacyjna w przedsiębiorstwie. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 1, 41–45.
  17. Wratny, J. (2015). Prawo do wynagrodzenia za pracę w świetle zasad sprawiedliwości i równości. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia, 2 (62), 297–315. DOI: 10.17951/g.2015.62.2.297.