Skip to content
Studia i Prace WNEiZ US

Previously: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace WNEiZ

Kartele i patenty a nakłady badawczo-rozwojowe przedsiębiorstw


(Cartels and patents, and R&D expenditures of companies)
DOI: 10.18276/sip.2018.51/3-13
Cite

The full text is available

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the impact of R&D cartel, full industry cartel, and patents on process innovation of companies, and consumer surplus, and total welfare. The reference scenario is here the Cournot rivalry without patent protection of inventions. In this paper, the quadratic costs of production of goods and R&D investments are assumed. The results of modelling and numerical analyses allowed to state that R&D cooperation (in the form of R&D cartel) is more effective and socially preferred instrument to stimulate innovation in the industry than interfirm rivalry motivated by patents. However, in industries characterized by relatively weak or medium knowledge spillovers, the most effective tool to enhance innovation is interfirm rivalry without patents. The latter constitutes one more argument against patents.
Preview PDF

Open PDF

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. W: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (s. 609–626). Princeton, MA: UMI.
  2. d’Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137.
  3. Boldrin, M., Levine, D. (2012). The Case Against Patents. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series.
  4. Dasgupta, P. (1986). The Theory of Technological Competition. W: J. Stiglitz, F. Mathewson (red.), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structures (s. 519–545). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  5. Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I. (1992). Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306.
  6. Karbowski, A. (2015). Kartele w trzech perspektywach: neoklasycznej, behawioralnej oraz etycznej. Gospodarka Narodowa, 277, 5–26.
  7. Kortum, S., Lerner, J. (1999). What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? Research Policy, 28, 1–22.
  8. Kultti, K., Takalo, T., Toikka, J. (2007). Patents hinder collusion. Helsinki Center of Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 144.